I have been a member of my church at the age of 8, and yet you claim to know more about it. You guys are just laughing at what I say with out backing up your logic. It helps in a debate to have good sound logic defending your point.
I was replying to another point, I am sorry for not making that more clear.
My church teaches that we should pray and find out for our selves whether or not something is true.
Way to avoid the point entirely. I claim to know more about it because you're obviously unaware of the blatant flaws it presents, more specifically, in its original text. You can try to skew the argument in your way by saying "oh, well, it was translated lots, so we don't really know!" but, the fact of the matter is, in its ORIGINAL TEXT, it promotes more inaccuracies than it does today.
Again, according to the original testament, the sun revolved around the earth. It was changed to adapt with modern times, because we now know, for a fact, that the sun doesn't revolve around the earth. God would've known about the bible before humans did, right?
Right, thats why we should bring out concrete proof, facts, points, etc about our beliefs instead of just saying our way is better and calling the other side an idiot.
Uh, right, and I displayed them in the links, and my argument. A paradox is the only mathematical way in which to prove an impossibility; the bible is a paradox, and I've explained how. The teachings of the bible are meant to be delivered by a "perfect" god, yet, this god wasn't aware of the universe, or, hell, our solar system's attributes until humans were.
Poll