Poll

Minecraft type?

FTB - Ultimate
11 (13.8%)
FTB - Direwolf20
7 (8.8%)
Terrafirma Craft
9 (11.3%)
Vinalla
37 (46.3%)
Technic/Tekkit - Specifiy
16 (20%)

Total Members Voted: 80

Author Topic: One year anniversary --- Syerjchep  (Read 76514 times)

So, switching the Tekkit server to Magic World?
Sookuw already has a decent Magic World server lots of people play on. FTB will probably do better and it more tekkit-like, but better.

Sookuw already has a decent Magic World server lots of people play on. FTB will probably do better and it more tekkit-like, but better.
Haven't seen his topic, but I guess I'm going to switch it over to FTB now.
edit: where do I get this new version?

I switched over and no one joined.
Gonna give it a bit more and if that doesn't work, switch back.
I might also try to advertise this somewhere else.

has terrafirmacraft been suggested yet :o

Terraria's up now.
I just realized that I had to install XNA framework along WITH microsoft.net

I'm all lonely here in terrarialand!

edit: aaand the server's in German. Wunderbar!
« Last Edit: December 22, 2012, 12:50:53 PM by Ipquarx »

I'm all lonely here in terrarialand!

edit: aaand the server's in German. Wunderbar!
I'll fix that.
Anyway, we had four people on at once.
Not bad.

updated, asking for advice

Well i would personally recommended Ubuntu or OpenSUSE

CentOS is as close to Redhat Enterprise as you're going to get for free
and Redhat Enterprise is literally meant for hosting stuff
« Last Edit: December 23, 2012, 01:40:14 PM by KoopaScooper »

Do they all support wine?
What does it mean that its meant for hosting? Whats the difference?
Will centos run bl, mc, source games, etc?

All Source servers have Linux variants
You can install Java through an RPM from the Oracle website
Wine can be installed through an RPM or through yum
Blockland servers run fine after version 1.4.6 in my experience with Wine
Doesn't use as many resources, as having an X11 environment open is an option
« Last Edit: December 23, 2012, 01:59:09 PM by KoopaScooper »

Arch Linux. Here's a quick brown townysis of those Linux distros from my experience:

Mint: Ubuntu with a twist. Useless for servers, you may as well just use Ubuntu because this doesn't add anything special.
CentOS: Terribly stuffty package manager, everything is ridiculously complicated to set up.
Fedora: Slow, old. I honestly can't even think of one server that runs it.
Debian: My personal favorite of the above, it's a little bit harder to use than ubuntu but it's less bogged down by stuff you don't even know you have.
Ubuntu: The worst linux distro to ever appear. In their attempt to make linux user friendly, they forgot that 99.99% of the people who use linux actually know what a computer is and now it's incredibly difficult to use. May be easier through command line, but it also comes with like 500gb of packages you didn't even know existed and don't know what they're used for, but if you try to uninstall one it's a dependency of 50 other packages you didn't know existed.
Gentoo: People still use this? I've never used it personally, so I can't really say anything about it.

If it's possible, go with Arch Linux.

Arch Linux: Comes bare bones. Install only the packages you need, one command makes this an absolute breeze. It's called Yaourt, and it will install and configure virtually every program that can run on linux flawlessly. This distro has the most comprehensive wiki of all linux distros, and their forum is almost a personal tech team to help you solve your problems that may not be covered by the wiki articles.

All of these distros will run wine.
« Last Edit: December 23, 2012, 02:05:14 PM by Trinick! »

Arch isn't there, freebsd, slackware, and something called openSUSE are there though.
And that's about it for the low cost options.

Also, Debian says it comes with over 29000 packages, is that what you meant with 'less bogged down with stuff'?