Gay or Nay?

[BanishedLetters]

Gay or European?

both

[Ad Bot]

[Frontrox]

both

That's pretty hot

[Headcrab Zombie]

To be fair wanting to bang someone you don't really know yet is still under the category of 'whore' even if one instance isn't enough to really label a person, but the same thing applies to a demiloveual or whatever you want to call it. Basically my point is, there's no reason for the term to exist.

Abstinence can be chosen even if loveual attraction is present for many reasons. A person may very much want to have love, but refrains because of, for example, their religious beliefs say that pre-marital love is bad. For a demiloveual, without an emotional bond, there is no desire, or even attraction.
Imagine you see a girl (I'm assuming you're straight, I didn't see any post from you saying otherwise) with every quality that you find attractive. She's pretty much perfect in your eyes. You would probably feel at least some amount of attraction. A demiloveual would not unless there's an emotional/romantic bond

[RedGajin]

then that demiloveual is just gay

[Wynd_Fox]

Not if he doesn't feel attraction towards men.

[Headcrab Zombie]

then that demiloveual is just gay

Then copy the same situation with guys too

[RedGajin]

so i mean that just 100% seems like bs, i mean is he just not born with hormones or something? because i mean everyone gets off at one point unless they dont have hands or something.

[brickybob]

Seuxal like I'm hetero.

[ultimamax]

To be fair wanting to bang someone you don't really know yet is still under the category of 'whore' even if one instance isn't enough to really label a person, but the same thing applies to a demiloveual or whatever you want to call it. Basically my point is, there's no reason for the term to exist.
What? You didn't really explain how it's differnet?
So it's being "gender blind"? Good for them, that's biloveuality, not placing an important on gender when considering loveual partners.

You're acting as though the norm is that people don't want to bang people they've never met before sometimes? It's how we evolved. Men are supposed to impregnate as many women as they can..

any of you identifying as anything other than heteroloveual, homoloveual, or biloveual are handicapped

I swear, it's like you only accept anything that's not straight because of the increasing internet bandwagon behind it. There's more to loveuality than bi/hetero/homoloveuals.

Once again though, does it really need a name?
Couldn't you just say you're "abstinate" ?To be fair, who's going to go to the doctor to prove they're gay or aloveual or whatever.

I don't think the doctor can prove your loveuality. I suppose it's who you want to bang.

so i mean that just 100% seems like bs, i mean is he just not born with hormones or something? because i mean everyone gets off at one point unless they dont have hands or something.

The thing about loveuality is that it's hard to prove that stuff like aloveuality/demiloveuality is legit. We can only trust the people who say they are these things that they are in fact those things. If they aren't legit then the term will fade out eventually, won't it? Either that or we find a way to prove loveuality.

[Sat]

"I'd like to say I'm heteroloveual, but sometimes, when nobody's watching, I let off spores into the wind."

said the conifer with a scrotum...

[TheLegomaster]

Who needs love? Mitosis ftw.

[_Rave_]

aloveuality is not a natural thing, don't be an idiot

[Mr. Jelly]

aloveuality is not a natural thing, don't be an idiot

ya well tell that to nature




plants reproduce aloveually all the time bitch

[Anti-Block]

Who needs love? Mitosis ftw.

it's mitosis

my tosis

[Axolotl2]

Heteroromantic biloveual (I find some men hot but being in a relationship with theme would be creepy imo (Any factor doesn't matter, it's still creepy))

aloveuality is not a natural thing, don't be an idiot

What if a person finds nobody attractive and they don't know why? Are they aloveual?