Author Topic: North Korea Tests Third Nuclear Bomb Despite Warnings from the UN  (Read 8526 times)


Not if they have 100 nukes ready
I feel like I should doubt they have that much, but they're probably all stuff. If they fire them at the U.S. (or whatever they target) it would most likely be destroyed before it could do any damage.

I feel like I should doubt they have that much, but they're probably all stuff. If they fire them at the U.S. (or whatever they target) it would most likely be destroyed before it could do any damage.
INB4russianstakeadvantageofNK

forget everyone, I'm in Brazil!

Now, where is the bunker?

http://i.imgur.com/On9sc45.jpg

I'd like to point out the size difference here. The nukes we have today are much closer in size to Hiroshima than the others. We don't need big super scary nukes now, because we have much more developed guidance systems.

I had to link the pic because it's big and I can't figure out how to resize it


INB4russianstakeadvantageofNK
if russia does, china will
then we're all forgeted

I had to link the pic because it's big and I can't figure out how to resize it

[img width=###'s]http://[/img]

Not if they have 100 nukes ready
This would result in many outcomes.

The US would deploy the 13th Bomb Squadron which consists of B-2 Spirits (Strategic Stealth Bomber) escorted by F-22 Raptors and take out the Nuclear Facilities with Mark 82 227kg all purpose bombs, or they would use the B61 Nuclear Bombs with a 0.3 - 370 Kiloton yield.

Or the US would also do a first strike Minuteman III (LGM-30) 300 Kiloton ICBM's(Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles) and/or Trident II (UMG-133) 100 Kiloton SLBM's (Submarine Launched Ballistic Missile) and strike the missile sites before they even get a chance.

OR, we would shoot down the ICBM's in boost phase with RIM-161 anti-ballistic-missile system.

how many warnings is the UN gonna give before action is taken?

how many warnings is the UN gonna give before action is taken?

I think the UN just wants to see North Korea blow themself up

why should the UN have any authority over the situation. everyone should have nukes.

This would result in many outcomes.

The US would deploy the 13th Bomb Squadron which consists of B-2 Spirits (Strategic Stealth Bomber) escorted by F-22 Raptors and take out the Nuclear Facilities with Mark 82 227kg all purpose bombs, or they would use the B61 Nuclear Bombs with a 0.3 - 370 Kiloton yield.

Or the US would also do a first strike Minuteman III (LGM-30) 300 Kiloton ICBM's(Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles) and/or Trident II (UMG-133) 100 Kiloton SLBM's (Submarine Launched Ballistic Missile) and strike the missile sites before they even get a chance.

OR, we would shoot down the ICBM's in boost phase with RIM-161 anti-ballistic-missile system.
thanks wikipedia

If there's any "WW3" the US with definitely not be involved, we're not getting nuked.

We send our entire naval fleet to South Korea and when North Korea nukes South Korea then we will get involved! It will be like Pearl Harbor 2 but with nukes!

thanks wikipedia
You're partly right. I get all my information from Wikipedia and other sites. But I memorize it all, everything I wrote was memorized.

We send our entire naval fleet to South Korea and when North Korea nukes South Korea then we will get involved! It will be like Pearl Harbor 2 but with nukes!
Holy forget, stop saying nukes, it sounds so handicapped. And this is NOT what would happen if North Korea attacked South Korea with nuclear weapons.

Holy forget, stop saying nukes, it sounds so handicapped

Nukes is a word.