Author Topic: GTA V Discussion Thread  (Read 18272 times)

I think San Andreas was the best, had the best online multilayer experience, doing awesome RPs as a hitman, doing some random stuff, and the story line was awesome too.  And when I played San Andreas I thought the graphics were amazing.  But that was in like 2005 or something lol, tricking out cars, just a whole load of fun for me.

GTA Vice City will always be the best GTA imo.
coughsanandreascough

does anybody know a good twitter-er for gta 5 news

People always say San Andreas has tons of stuff for you to do, but the quality of it isn't that amazing. Unlike in the other games, there's a multitude of collectibles. Oysters, horseshoes, photos and gang tags. But they're all the same really. You have more races, more stadiums than Vice City, but they're just the same thing. Nothing unique to them. Yeah, the map is big - but it still feels pretty empty.

The high point for San Andreas is the customization and stats, people really seem to like that.

What's unique to San Andreas is the Gang Wars, but that's there because of the theme of the game. Just like how Vice City had businesses you had to buy and do missions for, that was the theme: rising up and having a huge front for your drug business.

Yeah, there's a whole lot to do in San Andreas. It presents itself as having lots of different activities, but it seems like an illusion to me.

People always say San Andreas has tons of stuff for you to do, but the quality of it isn't that amazing. Unlike in the other games, there's a multitude of collectibles. Oysters, horseshoes, photos and gang tags. But they're all the same really. You have more races, more stadiums than Vice City, but they're just the same thing. Nothing unique to them. Yeah, the map is big - but it still feels pretty empty.

The high point for San Andreas is the customization and stats, people really seem to like that.

What's unique to San Andreas is the Gang Wars, but that's there because of the theme of the game. Just like how Vice City had businesses you had to buy and do missions for, that was the theme: rising up and having a huge front for your drug business.

Yeah, there's a whole lot to do in San Andreas. It presents itself as having lots of different activities, but it seems like an illusion to me.
Whats impressive about San Andreas is the way how the billiard minigame controls better than the one in GTA 4.

That doesn't change the fact that it's garbage.
Yeah okay, i can keep saying that i forgeted your mom even though it isn't true.
« Last Edit: July 11, 2013, 02:35:57 PM by Tonkka² »

That's not relevant. What you're saying is false. What I'm saying is true.

what about after GTA V, GTA VI? Vice City?

That's not relevant. What you're saying is false. What I'm saying is true.
Could you elaborate on that bit?

GTA VI must be Vice City. I would really want one to be in that Rust Belt city, Carcer City (Detroit.)

Could you elaborate on that bit?
Every GTA spinoff is garbage. No exceptions.

they might also rebuild Nowhere City

Watched the gameplay video yesterday.

Combat and driving looks way smoother than GTA IV, but I'm not much a fan with the heads-up display. It's a bit too small if you ask me.

i agree, the radar looks dumb

the driving looks less like you're piloting a landboat though which is great

I'm really hoping this game feels a lot more like san andreas than 4.
judging by what I've seen it will and I'm pretty excited.
It's the only game that I can think of that's coming out soon and I'm really looking forward to

coughsanandreascough

does anybody know a good twitter-er for gta 5 news
I would suggest a website but its technically a forum. Check gtav.net

Every GTA spinoff is garbage. No exceptions.
That's a pretty asinine statement.