Total Members Voted: 96
Voting closed: March 15, 2013, 01:08:25 AM
No, because you just called me a forget up, dumb ass, expect retaliation.
No, because you just called me a forget up, dumb ass, expect retaliation. On topic: This isn't a debate, it's a flame war.
Oh god, you're such a hypocrite.
It's only a flame war when you say it is.Besides, we're debating civilly, unlike you and Atlas.Both of you, please, keep on the topic at hand.
If the killing is completely intentional there should be a capital punishment option that the victims loved ones can choose.
So is that like an eye for an eye kind of belief? If he intentionally killed someone then he should be intentionally killed?
No, I just don't accept such narrow-minded insults.I told you that murdering the person in revenge won't bring them back. If it gives you the satisfaction I hope you realize that you're having the same feeling that they had when they killed them, you might as well killed your wife yourself.I can do this, if he doesn't continue to insult me.
Easily the dumbest thing I've read this month.
Shut up and debate, please.
I've already said my opinions and given reasons at least twice. If you're going to say that, say it to broze.
The idea that executing a murderer makes you as bad as them is ridiculous to me. They killed innocent people, you stopped a threat to innocent people.Besides, imprisonment is also vengeance. Justice is just lawful revenge.
I personally believe that if they can be confined to an area out of society due to that being to hazardous for them to go back out there than executing them would be illogical. Condemning them for a certain crime would only encourage rage and hatred. This actually shouldn't be about punishing someone at all, but protecting society like the original function of the police was.
Besides, imprisonment is also vengeance. Justice is just lawful revenge.