Since you're railing on assumptions why are you making the assumption he needs it for school or work?
i'm not arguing that he needs it for school or work, i'm arguing against you assuming he doesn't. it's almost as ridiculous as someone saying "You ate toast today because you didn't say you didn't". i even stated that i wasn't arguing for the "school and work" bit before, but you can just ignore that i guess.
i'm not. i'm saying you're silly for denying the possibility because you're "pretty positive" based on absolutely nothing.
Also the whole thing about not being able to use a school computer is handicapped. Since he is over 20 that means it's impossible for him to be in highschool. This would mean he attends some form of college or trade school. Every college has somewhere students can use computers. More than just 1 area too.
twenty four hours a day, seven days a week? i doubt it. i'm saying it's stupid for you to say "just use a school computer" when there are so many potential issues with that solution to the point where it can't defend whatever you're doing with the whole "build a computer or gtfo" bit.
An argument on blockland does not need to stand up to the scrutiny you think it needs to.
nice backpedaling there.
Just because I don't have empirical evidence that he didn't need that computer that very day doesn't mean it's more likely that he did need it that day.
except for when he expressed he needed the computer "NOW".
As far as I've seen so far nobody has any evidence of him needing it for school or work,
that's because no one's arguing for a point that has zero evidence, well except you of course.
So is a "what if" better than my argument?
i'm sorry are you arguing? i thought you were just mindlessly stuffting on people.
