Poll

What is your main sona?

House Cat
71 (7.7%)
Big Cat
25 (2.7%)
General Dog
24 (2.6%)
Wolf
68 (7.3%)
Fox
92 (9.9%)
Snake
5 (0.5%)
Naga
4 (0.4%)
Lizard
8 (0.9%)
Dragon
55 (5.9%)
Horse
5 (0.5%)
Deer
6 (0.6%)
General Bird
17 (1.8%)
Gryphon
11 (1.2%)
Bat
5 (0.5%)
Otter
10 (1.1%)
Rabbit
7 (0.8%)
Frog
3 (0.3%)
Shark
16 (1.7%)
Whale
7 (0.8%)
Raptor
8 (0.9%)
Owl
8 (0.9%)
Goo Creature
22 (2.4%)
Rubber Creature
3 (0.3%)
Latex Creature
31 (3.3%)
Bear
14 (1.5%)
Weasel
3 (0.3%)
Ferret
10 (1.1%)
Sergal
7 (0.8%)
Camel
12 (1.3%)
DeadFur
18 (1.9%)
Human
352 (38%)

Total Members Voted: 923

Author Topic: Furry Megathread - Furry Things Here  (Read 5254822 times)

But the animators just draw (to throw a random number) 50 frames and the rest is done by the program while the animators play jedi with cardboard tubes.

um the animators have the hard job.

so then why are you still following me on tumblr, huh? :)
because I like some of the things you reblog. following you on tumblr doesn't mean I like you
1 Christianity relates to everyone indirectly because it's constantly being pushed into fields that affect daily lives: politics, education, etc
2 Then maybe you shouldn't have dismissed men by saying
So let them speak, instead of dismissing their opinion as meaningless
3 Well aren't you just a fantastic, wonderful person
4 Maybe I'd agree with you if the context was "is 'bitch' a loveist term when used in an offensive matter"
But it's not
It's "is it loveist to use the word bitch as a synonym for 'whine' to describe yourself"And yes context does matter. As I said, it's one of the largest aspects of linguistics. Again, if you disagree, let the women voice their opinion.
1. no it doesn't. people do, and you can argue about the ways it relates to you all you want, but I'm pretty sure I've seen you arguing about it in ways that have no effect on you. just about the beliefs themselves being "wrong"
2. the opinion of men in this situation is meaningless. and I can't just "let them speak," they're not here. but it doesn't matter, because they already have
3. ok
4.  you can't just say something like that, then say "no I meant something entirely different!!" you can't use a word that is or was used to oppress people just because you want to


That's gotta suck, because cake is good.

all of the guys in frontrox's pics need a diet
gotta make em all skinny

1. no it doesn't. people do
Ok nice technicality you know what I meant
but I'm pretty sure I've seen you arguing about it in ways that have no effect on you. just about the beliefs themselves being "wrong"
Yeah I haven't done this in a while because it doesn't get anyone anywhere. I rarely bother with direct religion discussions anymore, I'm more active in things like "let's outlaw these people from marrying because my religion says so", creationism vs evolution discussions, or blatant anti-science bullstuff like "i think homoloveuality is a choice and i'm going to completely ignore any evidence to the contrary that I am presented with"

2. the opinion of men in this situation is meaningless.
Then why are you making such a big deal out of it?

and I can't just "let them speak," they're not here.
One did speak, but you immediately dismissed her statement and herself as "trash"
Here, I asked a friend about it
Quote
12:33 PM - Adam487: chappi i have a question for you
12:33 PM - Adam487: do you find the word 'bitch' to be loveist
12:33 PM - Churples is now Online.
12:33 PM - Adam487: specifically in the context of a man using it to describe himself as a synonym for 'whining'
12:33 PM - Churples: not exactly
12:34 PM - Churples: Like "Why are you bitching?"
12:34 PM - Adam487: person A accused person B of whining, person B replies "im not whining, i'm bitching"
12:34 PM - Adam487: sop basically
12:35 PM - Churples: ohhhh
12:35 PM - Churples: nah, I don't think of it as loveist
12:36 PM - Churples: but it is derogative
12:37 PM - Adam487: yeah the word can be, but not really in this situation
12:37 PM - Adam487: a guy started like a 5 page argument about it in this forum about the situation i described, im trying to actually get a female's point of view
12:38 PM - Churples: Ahhh, I see
12:38 PM - Churples: Yeah, I just see it as a more harsher way of saying whining

4.  you can't just say something like that, then say "no I meant something entirely different!!"
What? But I didn't do this?

you can't use a word that is or was used to oppress people just because you want to
I'm not using the words, I'm just saying it's a far stretch to label this usage as "oppressive" when multiple females have expressed no care

itt: night fox doesn't understand context


Then why are you making such a big deal out of it?
just because your opinion doesn't matter, doesn't mean it's okay that it's your opinion
One did speak, but you immediately dismissed her statement and herself as "trash"
Here, I asked a friend about it
what is so hard to understand about this? the fact that there are women who don't think it matters doesn't mean that the women who do think it matters can be ignored
What? But I didn't do this?
you're defending someone who did
I'm not using the words, I'm just saying it's a far stretch to label this usage as "oppressive" when multiple females have expressed no care
it's oppressive. not debatable. as for those "multiple females," see above
itt: night fox doesn't understand context
no, context just doesn't matter

you guys are bitching like a bunch of bitches in this bitch. just drop it so we can post more pictures of bitches

what is so hard to understand about this? the fact that there are women who don't think it matters doesn't mean that the women who do think it matters can be ignored
If someone has a problem with it, them they can speak up. They don't need someone that's not even in there group to be offended for them. It's also the fact that you immediately dismissed someone as "trash" that I have a problem with.

you're defending someone who did
Quote?

no, context just doesn't matter
There are words with literally hundreds of definitions. Which definition applies depends on the context, it absolutely does matter.
The definition you're making such a huge fuss about is literally just a synonym for complain. If you want to be a social justice warrior go find someone who is actually bashing women.

it's oppressive. not debatable.
Offensive, yes. Oppressive, no.
The word "monday" is oppressive because it was used as a replacement for names by people who deemed them unworthy of names
"Bitch" has no such history. A link you posted directly addresses the original meaning; it's not an oppressive meaning.  Additionally, here's a few snippets from the very same links you posted:
Quote
it can indicate a strong or assertive woman
Doesn't sound oppressive at all, quite the opposite
Quote
When used with a positive qualifier (good, funny, clever, etc.) in Britain, New Zealand and Australia, it can convey a positive sense of the object or person referred to
Hmm. Interesting.




If you're going to argue that the use of the word "bitch" is wrong regardless of the context, then I'm just going to reply with eight pages of search results of you using the word yourself (I don't know how to link it directly, sorry)

what is so hard to understand about this? the fact that there are women who don't think it matters doesn't mean that the women who do think it matters can be ignored
are there any women who do think that it matters on this forum? if so, i would like for them to speak up.
otherwise, quit your bitchin' about the word bitch

no, context just doesn't matter

i'm cigaretteged out from this argument
i'm gonna smoke a cigarette

Guys, seriously.  Just drop this BS and move on.

Guys, seriously.  Just drop this BS and move on.
Bitchstuff