A: You purposefully locked him in the cage. It is your fault and you would get in trouble.
B: Cats are not sapient. Humans are. It's a lot more of a loss to lose a person than it is a pet.
A: The dog was purposefully let to go ahead and attack 12 cats.
B: True. But it's an brown townogy. I wasn't comparing humans to cats, I was explaining how the situation of "that's how nature works" didn't work there.
And these basic rules of society include random assault + murder? I wouldn't trust somebody like that to teach me "society and basic rules".
And I could've sworn you just said that the neighbor wasn't at fault...
The first one was me being a handicap and letting anger lead me.
The second one was me saying his logic. He was blaming the cat owner for leaving the cats outside but not the dog owner for letting their dog out to go ahead and attack other pets. I know it sounds like I'm saying the neighbor wasn't at fault but that's not what I meant. I was just pointing how it didn't make sense to blame the cat owner but not the dog owner.
[im g]http://emotibot.net/pix/6834.gif[/img]
A white person regarded as having a provincial, conservative, often
bigoted attitude.
Oh, now the "humans are better than animals" is correct, but only when it is for your gain.
What does this exactly mean? Are you referring back to the post I made about locking the guy in a cage? Again, that's not what I meant. I was trying to explain how stupid "that's how nature works" sounded.
Legal action =/= cold blooded torture
Except that no where did I tell anyone to pursue into cold blooded torture. Read above.
