HamHost Dedicated Blockland servers | New poll: More free-user features?

[Rub]

Android has stuff support for websockets, hence why we chose to use Socket.IO

See: http://caniuse.com/websockets

[Ad Bot]

[Ben Grapevine]

python SUX


that is all.

[hammereditor²]

Android has stuff support for websockets, hence why we chose to use Socket.IO

See: http://caniuse.com/websockets

But I can't use Java with Socket.IO.
I will first test my Java web socket server with my Android phone. If the communication doesn't work, I will try installing other web browsers to see if that helps. If not, I will go through all the pain to use Socket.IO.

[Rub]

https://github.com/mrniko/netty-socketio

Socket.IO is actually easier than raw WebSockets, trust me.

[{Pacnet2013}]

https://github.com/mrniko/netty-socketio

Socket.IO is actually easier than raw WebSockets, trust me.

I agree completely, it's a better idea to use Socket.IO especially so you can learn more about networking and expand your knowledge as well as provide better support for mobile devices.


There's no problem in learning something new and useful. I hope you take this decision.

[MonkeyFunkyMonkey]

I reinstalled and its still not working slayer ctf

[Lugnut]

I reinstalled and its still not working slayer ctf

did you modify the config/server/ADD_ON_LIST.cs?

[MonkeyFunkyMonkey]

did you modify the config/server/ADD_ON_LIST.cs?

Why would i have to if its the same name

[hammereditor²]

Using web sockets with JavaScript is very difficult. I have tried for 3 hours, and I haven't set up a WebSocket server yet. I tired Socket.IO, but it seems very hard to configure. I tried a Java implementation of Socket.IO, but the source code requires hundreds of dependencies which would take weeks to find.
I have attempted jWebSocket, but when I run the standard server, it shuts down and shows no reason or error in the command prompt window. I can run the local version of jWebSocket, but that's pointless since users outside the local network need to access it.
I have looked at node.js, but it seems like a pain to configure and set up.
I think it'll take longer to set up the web socket server than to actually write the code.
So does anybody have any ideas?

[Rub]

Maybe keep trying? The Node.JS Socket.IO servers for RTBs console, chat and activity stream took about an hour having never coded Node or Socket.IO before. Read the documentation, not difficult.

[Lugnut]

Using web sockets with JavaScript is very difficult. I have tried for 3 hours, and I haven't set up a WebSocket server yet. I tired Socket.IO, but it seems very hard to configure. I tried a Java implementation of Socket.IO, but the source code requires hundreds of dependencies which would take weeks to find.
I have attempted jWebSocket, but when I run the standard server, it shuts down and shows no reason or error in the command prompt window. I can run the local version of jWebSocket, but that's pointless since users outside the local network need to access it.
I have looked at node.js, but it seems like a pain to configure and set up.
I think it'll take longer to set up the web socket server than to actually write the code.
So does anybody have any ideas?

Code: [Select]

<script src="/socket.io/socket.io.js"></script>
<script>
  var socket = io.connect('http://localhost');
  socket.on('news', function (data) {
    console.log(data);
    socket.emit('my other event', { my: 'data' });
  });
</script>
done
from the main site ffs

[hammereditor²]

Actually, I've managed to get jWebSocket server running. I'll try creating a basic echo server with that tomorrow.

[hammereditor²]

Here's the status on the web control panel:
I am having difficulties running the Java application server. Whenever the jWebSocket engine starts, it can't find the package "org.jWebSocket. tcp.TCPEngine". Fortunately, I found the source code on code.Google.com and I will try to manually compile the "tcp" package into a .jar, and use it.
After that, everything will be easy. Even the client-sided web page.

Unfortunately, HamHost will only have PayPal once the Web HHCP is complete.

[Blake1]

To be honest, this looks really nice.

May get a premium account or close my CBMHost account.

[hammereditor²]

To be honest, this looks really nice.

May get a premium account or close my CBMHost account.

Yeah, I think it's a good idea to close your CBM account so that people who want CBMhost can have it.
Remember that once the web panel is created, only premium users can use it.