Poll

Thoughts?

Yes
109 (83.2%)
No
13 (9.9%)
I see no use
9 (6.9%)

Total Members Voted: 131

Author Topic: Do you think we should increase funding for NASA?  (Read 9561 times)


Found this cool post on reddit explaining why space exploration is important.
http://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/jxgpw/so_what_is_so_good_about_space_exploration/c2fx31l
True, but it's not happening at a rate where we need to immediately rush out humans to space and evacuate Earth to slow/stop stuff.

But my point still stands, we should continue on better priorities besides manning other planets like curing diseases and cancer, become more economically stable, help developing countries, solving world hunger, and advance more in technology like to develop more efficient fuel to even begin traveling farther than our moon because our usual chemical reactions using gasoline and rocket fuel are very hard to transport in space and the energy output won't get us far very fast.
1. saying "we need to cure cancer" is like saying "we need to cure disease". the goal of cancer research is prevention/detection.
2. NASA will create jobs and inspire children to enter STEM fields, which would help our economy, and could lead to technologies that help the earth in return.
3. in the process of researching how to get farther than the moon with a manned capsule, NASA will likely invent more efficient ways of getting to new places in space.
4. in the process of researching new missions in general, NASA will create technologies that benefit the earth as it has before.
Holy god no. I'm going to spare you all the massive explanation and paragraph and hope you can work it out for yourselves. Can you imagine if the American Military or Government got their hands on Orbital Bombardment technology? Or a technology that is completely out of reach for any other nation on Earth? You probably think NASA would only increase the amount of robots on Mars and put a man there in less time than already planned. Nope, there's a reason America has a military budget three times larger than the entire world's put together.

Increased funding for space exploration would be great ONLY if the entire planet put together some kind of coalition space agency and every state and country of Earth progressed at the same median rate as opposed to one single nation having too much power. Once again, there's a reason there are massive universal laws upon who can actually claim ownership of the moon and other celestial out-with earth objects.

The same awful scenario occurred when America was the only nation to have the atomic bomb in its possession. If the national socialist Regime was still in full swing by that time, it would have ended the entirety of WW2 - there's no question about it. Thank god Russia got its arse in gear and begun development of the same calibur.

Sorry to burst your bubble guys; humans are ass holes and there's no doubt that the technology that increased funding to NASA would open up new technologies that could be abused.
what the hell? if we already have private companies putting satellites above earth, there's no reason the USA can't just put an orbital death cannon up there now. it won't change anything; nuclear weapons still exist.
edit: besides, if humans are such starfishs, our goal should be getting off this planet, since it's bound to destroy itself by that logic.

It's sad how many of you are misinformed. The United States Military bombed and killed thousands of innocent people at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They don't give forgets about bombing someone else. The only thing stopping them is being bombed back, and for you Americans - they couldn't give two forgets if the American people were bombed. They care about their government and infrastructure It would cost too much to actually be bombed and a large percentage of their military capability would be gone.
hey uh handicap

the atomic bomb was dropped via plane

not sure how the forget it fits into the space program

Now imagine an American weapon in space, untouchable by any other nation. America has full control as well as the most powerful military on Earth. Checkmate.

Although funnily enough America colonizing Mars would probably give them motive to bomb someone because for forgets sake they're on Mars and untouchable. Even if these are unrealistic scenarios and you think it's stupid and they're improbable. It's still a standing fact that any nation that has power that would make them pretty much immortal is a very, very bad thing.

Also, give me a source for that 'law' of yours that prohibits any space weaponry.
America doesn't need orbital bombardment, we have enough nuclear ICBM's to destroy the world 5 times over, and I'm not sure how orbital weaponry fits into the NASA space program. That's military funding, and if the military WANTED to develop orbital weaponry, they'd have it done by tomorrow.

You're denying the expanding of humanities horizons because you think America has some sort of global domination plan. You're loving delusional.

How about we push some funding for exploring our Ocean a little more? There's a ton of stuff down there that would be rather useful.

How about we push some funding for exploring our Ocean a little more? There's a ton of stuff down there that would be rather useful.
there's no reason we can't do both simultaneously. the govt just needs to throw a bone to the science community.

there's no reason we can't do both simultaneously. the govt just needs to throw a bone to the science community.
Because the gov has tons of money that it can just print out~

there's no reason we can't do both simultaneously. the govt just needs to throw a bone to the science community.
no we cant do both simultaneously.
do you really think we are going to the moon for free? or do you think we will build the 51st state of america underwater for free? no, we only have so much money, we cant spend it on ocean exploration and space exploration without getting half assed jobs from both fields. its one or the other.

no we cant do both simultaneously.
do you really think we are going to the moon for free? or do you think we will build the 51st state of america underwater for free? no, we only have so much money, we cant spend it on ocean exploration and space exploration without getting half assed jobs from both fields. its one or the other.
yeah we only have so much money and right now it's all going to Afghanistan and retirement homes

Guys, if you take the A out of NASA you get NSA. Or NAS It's a trick, don't do it!

no we cant do both simultaneously.
do you really think we are going to the moon for free? or do you think we will build the 51st state of america underwater for free? no, we only have so much money, we cant spend it on ocean exploration and space exploration without getting half assed jobs from both fields. its one or the other.
Because the gov has tons of money that it can just print out~
have you seen how much money is spent on the US military? have you seen how much money is WASTED by the US government? NASA isn't asking for much, and the value returned in discoveries/economic stimulation has much potential

For a good few minutes I thought the title said "Do you think we should increase funding for NSA?" and was wondering why everyone was going "Yes"

Guys, if you take the A out of NASA you get NSA. Or NAS It's a trick, don't do it!
no you get NS

have you seen how much money is spent on the US military? have you seen how much money is WASTED by the US government? NASA isn't asking for much, and the value returned in discoveries/economic stimulation has much potential
Yup

In case you didn't find the sarcasm in my text. Our military certainly isn't a waste though IMO.

more money on space exploration + military

less money on healthcare and welfare and pretty much everything else



i really honestly don't think this is necessary