Poll

well?

heteroloveual
213 (68.9%)
homoloveual
28 (9.1%)
biloveual
35 (11.3%)
panloveaul
12 (3.9%)
polyloveual
3 (1%)
aloveual
10 (3.2%)
zoophilia
8 (2.6%)

Total Members Voted: 309

Author Topic: Poll - loveual orientation  (Read 20749 times)

Are we now acting like zoophilia is a normal thing?...

Oh.
Yeah......



To be quite ann frank here guys;

We need to stop being so concerned with what people think about how you choose to live your life.
If some people refuse to accept something, you can't force it down their throats.

This doesn't mean voicing your opinion is wrong.

People are allowed to carry their own opinions. As am I.

Opinions are like richards. You can be proud of your own, but you can't shove it down other's throats.
« Last Edit: August 14, 2013, 03:04:30 AM by Pandan »

Did I miss somewhere that it is now 100% fine to sodomize a dog? I must've been dead for awhile.

yeah but the difference is so minimal it's almost non-existent. for every homoloveual couple that dies out a heteroloveual couple creates two above the average.
I wasn't even being serious about what I said to pandan yo
but nothing will ever change the fact that homoloveual people do not under normal circumstances contribute to population growth
Did I miss somewhere that it is now 100% fine to sodomize a dog? I must've been dead for awhile.
when did anyone even say that. I must've been dead when they did

Maybe zoophilia can become a fad...

Nah...

I knew you weren't serious night fox lol

I knew you weren't serious night fox lol
I'm glad we have an understanding

I haven't had a great smirk on my face in awhile, thank you.
So much for me expecting a mature discussion. Atleast I have the decency to not try and get a rise out of the other by putting a silly taunt as the first sentence in your argument.

Quote
I'm sure you read very heavily on it.

You deny that research on homoloveuality isn't inconclusive? Because it is. All your sources are bias. Most sources have a bias.
And having a source battle doesn't prove anything but how handicapped you look.

The argument on whether anyone is "fine" with homoloveuality has little to do with science. Because the scientific evidence reflects our study on nature.
Homoloveuality is not productive. And therefore, useless.
As sources are most of the time bias, Opinion is almost 100% of the time bias because opinion is simply what it is, and Bias branches off of it.

Sources however atleast explain the point with SOME bias, rather than be completely bias and only spew opinion with no real context or matter.
As for the useless factor of Homoloveuality, Yeah. It's useless. Your point? If we got rid of everything useless in this world, then most of the stuff you see today would be gone, like anime for instance. Anime is useless, why not get rid of it? Yeah, it provides entertainment but that's not valid. Being loveual with what you enjoy provides happiness and stress relief, so not it isn't entirely useless just like everything else. Everything is useless is one way or another.

Quote
I don't take anything a furry says with the least bit seriousness anyways. But thanks for your input.
Wow. This blows my mind how you talk about how bias is bad, yet you show clear bias here.
Not willing to pay attention to somebody associate with a fandom (Whether or not it's involved in the topic) is immature and ignorant at best. You're 20 and you're completely disregarding everything somebody says over what type of artwork they like.

It's bias because of your opinion is fixated on your dislike for furries and refusal to look at their opinion simply for being furries. With this question and that being said, Explain your logic please. I'd be thrilled to know how your brain works with how immature you are, acting like saying one of the oldest insults to furries will make me enraged or something.

Wow. This blows my mind how you talk about how bias is bad, yet you show clear bias here.
Not willing to pay attention to somebody associate with a fandom (Whether or not it's involved in the topic) is immature and ignorant at best. You're 20 and you're completely disregarding everything somebody says over what type of artwork they like.
It's bias because of your opinion is fixated on your dislike for furries and refusal to look at their opinion simply for being furries. With this question and that being said, Explain your logic please. I'd be thrilled to know how your brain works with how immature you are, acting like saying one of the oldest insults to furries will make me enraged or something.
um
sorry to be the one to tell you this but
you have been successfully trolled, dawg

um
sorry to be the one to tell you this but
you have been successfully trolled, dawg
I wouldn't call myself trolled if I'm not mad.
« Last Edit: August 14, 2013, 08:45:13 AM by PitDeggeh² »

seem pretty mad to me lol
« Last Edit: August 14, 2013, 11:59:25 AM by .::Taboo::. »



i don't think anyone is implying zoophilia is normal

loveUAL ORIENTATION
Zoophilia is not a loveual orientation.

It is a special interest.

Zoophilia is not a loveual orientation.

It is a special interest.

It's also abnormal and a tad disturbed to be a zoophile.