I love that you're under the impression that you can immediately assume my ideals given accouple of posts in a blockland forum political topic. Again, quit assuming superior knowledge here, it has yet to do anything but hinder your argument.
I'm claiming the GOP's actions are based on their personal suffering, which is based on them being funded by lobbyists who come primarily from insurance companies, who will lose money if Obamacare passes. I'll nab sources for you if you want, but I don't think I should have to.
I didn't assume your ideals. You protected Obamacare, so I stuck it under something you like. You stated blatantly that political parties are not out for the wellbeing of people, so I stuck that on there too. I said "whatever other beliefs you have" because I don't know any others, you haven't stated them.
On the "other" side, I stuck things you already said you don't identify with, plus some obvious ones. You're insulting the GOP directly, saying you're not a democrat (also slighting both by insulting parties in general), other people with different opinions are obviously on the other side, and whatever else you don't like because, again, I didn't want to assume anything. The closest thing to an assumption is me sticking "execs" over the first guys head in the "other" section, and that was done in jest.
Furthermore, you can't state something like "the GOP's actions are based on [...] them being funded by lobbyists who come primarily from insurance companies, who will lose money if Obamacare passes" as fact. You simply can't do it. You are not the GOP, you can speculate on their motivations but you can't say for sure. You can cite a hundred thousand sources, but in the end they're all opinion articles. When it comes down to it, the GOP supports a small government in general and nationalized healthcare is increasing the power of the government. It's directly contrary to their ideals.
