Author Topic: praying before you eat  (Read 25715 times)

my god, religions and beliefs aren't immune from criticisms or mockery, let alone harmless laughter at a relative's dinner table.  Beliefs don't have rights, they're meant to be contested.
sure they're not immune from criticism and debate but that's not harmless laughter.  if you have dinner with people who follow a religion hard enough to pray before a meal you shouldn't start laughing them "harmlessly", because it's not like they're going to be laughing.  just stay silent and pause, damn.  beliefs shouldn't be contested at a loving dinner table.

overruled, the term "whore" cannot be used to describe someone of a higher authority.  "Whore" cannot be used to that effect.

source:  ME (two out of two letters are capitalized, therefore 100% authority and considered supreme authority).

Excuse me, but are you referring to the area of authority under Paul LePage?

When you sit down to enjoy a good meal with company, the last thing you want to do is openly mock them for praying.

It'd be more respectful to stuff on the table.
I don't, the comment was an over exaggeration on an action I may participate in given my current mindset.  I understand respecting others right to express belief, but that doesn't mean I can't find something they take seriously humorous.  The whole "I want to get offended just to be offended" thing is really getting out of hand.  It's how tumblr feminists treat situations.  No matter how minor the incident may be, they blow it out of proportion and state it's outlandish ridicule.

And if you actually think laughing at a dinner table for someone's beliefs being different is more disrespectful than stuffting on the table, you're perception on reality is so warped it's depressing.

Lalam has been itching for a fight ever since he pulled a post from /pol/ to try and start garbage here.
But I didn't start this.  I made a harmless comment that was blown way out of proportion.  I've been defending myself ever since.

i dont consider mocking to go hand in hand with it

that goes hand in hand with being a pretentious cunt
I don't really see any argument here, but okay.  The only thing you've really done is come and insult me because I'm disagreeing with you.  The "armchair philosopher" thing started in a previous topic.  If you want to talk about mocking, you're the one actually doing it.

just because she "understood" it doesn't mean it was right
it's not referring to people using your grammar issues in their argument
It's saying you ignore points and jump right to grammar because that's all you can figure out what to do.

sure they're not immune from criticism and debate but that's not harmless laughter.  if you have dinner with people who follow a religion hard enough to pray before a meal you shouldn't start laughing them "harmlessly", because it's not like they're going to be laughing.  just stay silent and pause, damn.  beliefs shouldn't be contested at a loving dinner table.
It is.  I've had several religious friends who I've had a good laugh with because we could get into great detail about some of the more silly things religious beliefs offer.  You guys keep assuming what you think will happen is what has to happen.  Stop it, stop assuming you're the keeper of all social interactions and define exactly how dinner discussions will work.
« Last Edit: October 27, 2013, 12:36:51 AM by Lalam24 »

i made a new avatar for you lalam

it has a fedora to go with your personality

Beliefs don't have rights
have you ever heard of freedom of religion?

Excuse me, but are you referring to the area of authority under Paul LePage?
no, maine is considered to be just a summer vacation spot, not an actual state.  the word was "ME", as in referring to myself.

It is.  I've had several religious friends who I've had a good laugh with because we could get into great detail about some of the more silly things religious beliefs offer.  You guys keep assuming what you think will happen is what has to happen.  Stop it, stop assuming you're the keeper of all social interactions and define exactly how dinner discussions will work.
are your friends even religious because any religious person i know who prays before meals would get offended if you just blatantly laugh at them

i made a new avatar for you lalam

it has a fedora to go with your personality

lmfao

have you ever heard of freedom of religion?
Freedom of religion states people can have individual beliefs

that doesn't mean the beliefs are free from ridicule or mockery

i made a new avatar for you lalam

it has a fedora to go with your personality

Again, the only thing you're useful for is pointless insults to follow some really piss poor arguments.

It's saying you ignore points and jump right to grammar because that's all you can figure out what to do.
no, it isn't
read it
and actually read it, don't just look at a few key words and make assumptions
when someone says something about your grammar being improper, that's not what it means. it's talking about the following situation, when you criticize them for saying that thing

also when are you going to stop replying? i thought you said you were gonna stop, but you still are???

that doesn't mean the beliefs are free from ridicule or mockery
Again, the only thing you're useful for is pointless insults to follow some really piss poor arguments.
look i tried to add a trench coat too but i'm not that good at photoshop

im sorry if you dont like it

it's not even about being free to practice your religion.

it's about being a respectful human being and not laughing at someone else's beliefs.

are your friends even religious because any religious person i know who prays before meals would get offended if you just blatantly laugh at them
when you're proposing a sense of humor that they understand is twisted and enjoy because they learn to make fun of themselves and their beliefs (as any socially active person should be able to do), they aren't going to get on your ass, they can even do the opposite.  And, no, my friend who decided to translate entire segments of the bible from its original hebrew text and joined the armed forces because he believed God told him to was definitely not religious.

I need to reiterate: your perception on everyone's belief standards isn't universal.  Even if it's common, it doesn't happen everywhere, and it doesn't have to happen in a hypothetical that's open to thousands of different outcomes.

also when are you going to stop replying? i thought you said you were gonna stop, but you still are???
stopped replying to stocking

I don't really see any argument here, but okay.

The argument is that you're a pretentious cunt. How is that hard to miss?

And, no, my friend who decided to translate entire segments of the bible from its original hebrew text and joined the armed forces because he believed God told him to was definitely not religious.

lmao

it's not even about being free to practice your religion.

it's about being a respectful human being and not laughing at someone else's beliefs.
you can take that two ways, religious beliefs often impair the lifestyles of others, and being respectful also means being respectful to those who disagree with you, even if they "mock" you.

The argument is that you're a pretentious cunt. How is that hard to miss?


i took that as his acceptance of being a cunt