General Opinions on Personal add-ons?

[skoopdahoop]

Blockland community. Most entitled community ever.

By God I can hear the tears in each post you make.

As much as I enjoy mods unlocking this topic b/c OP is a big victim-playing baby, this topic has turned into a big slap fight. Just saying.

[Ad Bot]

[Zacks]

-snip-

Did you just enable your cunt mode since I don't think I bashed you.

[.::Taboo::.]

it's really hard not to stuff on pandan when he's just outright begging for it

[Pandan]

Did you just enable your cunt mode since I don't think I bashed you.

So your rebuttal is that i'm a cunt.

I abbreviated what you said, using my comedy quotes.
I think you're just as a entitled person as the rest of them.

it's really hard not to stuff on pandan when he's just outright begging for it

No. It's because you guys don't have a good enough counter argument for this.
All I hear is "Well. it should be released because people want it"

AKA: entitlement.

[Pandan]

As you can see by the poll, a majority of people agree with the Personal add-on idea.

And since the line between personal and private add-ons is so thin.
I'm glad to hear that the majority of you guys aren't as stupid as the ones I've seen here posting in this thread.

I think creators should boycott public releases for a bit.

[Zacks]

So your rebuttal is that i'm a cunt.

I abbreviated what you said, using my comedy quotes.
I think you're just as a entitled person as the rest of them.

How am I "just as a entitled person" by the rest of them who do you mean? Like everyone you replied to you insulting them?

[Pandan]

How am I "just as a entitled person" by the rest of them who do you mean? Like everyone you replied to you insulting them?

Did you read what you said?

You said that Elms trees should be released because people want them.
Did you ever think that Elm wanted to keep them for his server?

Also, I have no clue about the WHOLE story. I don't know if he was inner-circling them or not.
But let's just use this as an example, because that's what this thread has been inspired by anyways.

Read  your own posts dude. Stop being a boltser

[Zacks]

Did you read what you said?

You said that Elms trees should be released because people want them.
Did you ever think that Elm wanted to keep them for his server?

Also, I have no clue about the WHOLE story. I don't know if he was inner-circling them or not.
But let's just use this as an example, because that's what this thread has been inspired by anyways.

Read  your own posts dude. Stop being a boltser

Have you read the rest of it I said since it was already stolen he should've just released it since it was already stolen. How am I being a boltster just really boltster seems all tough and a person you don't want to mess with. How am I being anything like that but since it seems like I keep fueling your hatred with every reply I make. I'll just leave the thread so it doesn't have another 7 page long fight. That can end up with a drama and maybe even an ban so if you want to contiue arguing please pm me.

So the topic can have others peoples opinions.

[Pandan]

I hate people who think that add-on authors need to be releasing everything they make.
And that the community is entitled to everything that anyone works hard on for themselves.

I've stated my crystal clear point 30 times.
And throughout this thread, all I read is "people want it, so release it"

You guys are seriously loving dumb for thinking that.

[elm]

Also, I have no clue about the WHOLE story. I don't know if he was inner-circling them or not.
But let's just use this as an example, because that's what this thread has been inspired by anyways.

I don't get why people think I gave out my bricks. I Didn't give them out once..

[Pandan]

Okay so you didn't give them out. Which strengthens my resolve for this debate even further. You have been wronged by the entitled community.

http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=241926.0

Here's a great example of when Private add-ons should be frowned upon.

Port made soft shadows. Originally not planning to release them (Not publically stated)
She made a thread showing them off to people.
People complained, for good reason. The thread's purpose was to rub it into people's faces.
Finally Port released them.

Should Port be forced to release them? No.
But rubbing them into people's faces isn't cool either.


Btw like 90% of blockland players don't even have good enough computers to run shaders above OFF anyways.
But besides my point.

[Deadzone]

yes, uniqueness.

Not really. You can have all the richards and 'rape-mods' you want on your server, it doesn't help unless if it's contributing to the game that you're making, which even then only serves to make whatever you're making more convinient/variated.

If I host a free build server and have a bunch of 'unique' add-ons; it won't make much of a difference. The most popular servers have barely any unique playertypes/weapons/servermods, and coincidentally the people that play on them don't go there for the add-ons, they go there to play the game.

[DiceyGrammar]

i still really want to know how people are pulling models from the cache now

to me that should work on the same basis as 'build stealing' - if you don't want people using your creative assets in their own servers, you shouldn't be hosting it in public

[The Resonte!]

believe or not, there are great unique servers that doesn't have personal add-ons

Btw like 90% of blockland players don't even have good enough computers to run shaders above OFF anyways.

where'd you get that statistic

[MARBLE MAN]

i still really want to know how people are pulling models from the cache now

to me that should work on the same basis as 'build stealing' - if you don't want people using your creative assets in their own servers, you shouldn't be hosting it in public

You're stupid

User was banned for this post