Author Topic: Bones is practicing photography. Opinions? (new camera)  (Read 4402 times)

increase your shutterspeed to at least 1/200 for the waterfall pictures: it looks bad blurred.
shutterspeed is how quick the camera takes the picture. if you take a picture of a fan with 1 second shutterspeed then you are going to see that the fan is moving in the picture, but if you take it with 1/200 shutterspeed, the fan will look like it is not moving.

increase your shutterspeed to at least 1/200 for the waterfall pictures: it looks bad blurred.
shutterspeed is how quick the camera takes the picture. if you take a picture of a fan with 1 second shutterspeed then you are going to see that the fan is moving in the picture, but if you take it with 1/200 shutterspeed, the fan will look like it is not moving.


I think he purposely did the waterfall ones with a low shutter speed to get that effect.

carrots for santa?

loving communist
Some people place carrots for the reindeer.

Some people place carrots for the reindeer.

Caribou don't eat carrots, though!

I understand what you're saying with the focal point, but I don't see how it's relevant with my aperture settings.

For example, the waterfall pictures were supposed to be blurred. I don't have a neutral density filter, so I had to use the smallest aperture to prevent overexposure. This of course widened the depth of field.

I'm in no way defending those pictures because I know they aren't good, but your argument doesn't really make sense to me. As someone else said, landscapes don't have a focal point. If I had that neutral density filter, stuff would be a lot more fun. I've spent so much money though.

Can it do HDR?

Real HDR isn't a camera setting. It's done in in post processing by combining multiple photos with different exposure settings. So yes. lol

Look at all this expensive hardware you're getting :o

How much was it

:(


in this one and the one below it i have no idea where the focal point is, the contrast looks to harsh and kind of awkward as well.

That's what I was going for. :(

also, my system as of now

« Last Edit: January 03, 2014, 09:46:50 PM by Bones4 »

Real HDR isn't a camera setting. It's done in in post processing by combining multiple photos with different exposure settings. So yes. lol
Some cameras automate this process.

If they do, it's most likely simulated.

My mom has a really good camera. It cost more than me.

the only one that really stands out is the cat one

great work though!


the forget
santa dont wanna eat no vegetables
why are we all so focused on santa, he just delivers presents
what if those carrots are meant for the reindeer who have to pull all that stuff? give them some credit

also that's a really lovey camera you've got, that picture quality is fantastic

the forget
santa dont wanna eat no vegetables
at first I thought there was someone hiding behind the coffee table cus they look like fingerz

If they do, it's most likely simulated.

Nope. There are cameras that shoot true HDR; you set the middle exposure, and it takes a high, mid, and low exposure photo. The exposure difference between them is set up before hand - 1/3 step is common.

My mom has a really good camera. It cost more than me.
How much do you cost?

Nope. There are cameras that shoot true HDR; you set the middle exposure, and it takes a high, mid, and low exposure photo. The exposure difference between them is set up before hand - 1/3 step is common.

I know, they're shot with multiple photos...  I'm not aware of cameras that actually compile the images.