I understand what you're saying with the focal point, but I don't see how it's relevant with my aperture settings.
For example, the waterfall pictures were supposed to be blurred. I don't have a neutral density filter, so I had to use the smallest aperture to prevent overexposure. This of course widened the depth of field.
I'm in no way defending those pictures because I know they aren't good, but your argument doesn't really make sense to me. As someone else said, landscapes don't have a focal point. If I had that neutral density filter, stuff would be a lot more fun. I've spent so much money though.
Can it do HDR?
Real HDR isn't a camera setting. It's done in in post processing by combining multiple photos with different exposure settings. So yes. lol
Look at all this expensive hardware you're getting :o
How much was it
:(

in this one and the one below it i have no idea where the focal point is, the contrast looks to harsh and kind of awkward as well.
That's what I was going for. :(
also, my system as of now
