Poll

next rp topic?

post apoc america
roman era (circa 200 bc)
ww2

Author Topic: Sid Jairo's Europa Forumalis: Cold War Mini - AND THE WINNER IS... ROME?!  (Read 148576 times)

I claim the proposal.

Also Jairo, Cuba has been at war with the democratic powerhouse of a superpower and at war with European League.

They should have been dead by now.
« Last Edit: March 16, 2014, 01:09:04 PM by Swat 3 »

cuba hasn't been receiving supplies from ussr, so they've been less of a threat to usa then ussr invading alaska and their european allies

for that reason the usa hasn't been attacking them

plus great britain pulled out to go fight ussr and kuwait

there's an unofficial ceasefire happening

We've been receiving supplies from Yugoslavia so...

Note for some of that time you've had blockades and US forces in the area to block/intrcept ships.

We've been receiving supplies from Yugoslavia so...

not anymore, I've been blockading any trades for awhile.


Yugoslavia and Cuba have navies..?

not anymore, I've been blockading any trades for awhile.
>Australian navy
They have like 6 Frigates total, what if comrade China decides to attack? Plus All the Red Pact minors have navies of their own.

Yugoslavia asks Albania, Bulgaria, and Romania into forming coalition navy with Yugoslavia into removing DAPP/EL from Red Sea.

This entire game I've been developing my navy, I wouldn't say there's just 6 frigates.

Did I mention I posses two aircraft carriers?

I am unsure what my proposal should be.

I would like to hold a meeting with USA (aka jairo get on steam).

I am unsure what my proposal should be.

I would like to hold a meeting with USA (aka jairo get on steam).
please don't claim if it you can't think of a proposal

Proposal:

Add an article or something that will automatically remove/shut up a proposal that would allow the breach of the citizen's/country's right of liberty, freedom, and equality. This would include forcing countries to breach alliances by embargoing each other *cough* and forcing everyone to do something that would breach a citizen's right of liberty, freedom, and equality.

This does not mean that no one can make offensive proposals AGAINST something. Remember that the U.N. was formed in the name of freedom and equality.
« Last Edit: March 16, 2014, 08:50:38 PM by Swat 3 »


That's so loving stupid. Removing the ability for people to surrender? What war mongering piece of stuff would propose that?

Proposal:
This would include forcing countries to breach alliances by embargoing each other *cough*
there's no point in an offensive proposal if we don't do it to an ally
seriously
that means half of the countries in the world don't have to partcipate in an offending vote