Author Topic: Facebook adds 50 new gender options  (Read 45814 times)

Idk, being gay (or any significant deviation from hetero) doesn't make the most sense from an evolutionary perspective, it just seems to be an abnormal behavior that doesn't suit biological survival much

No one ever said it did nor it was supposed to.


Idk, being gay (or any significant deviation from hetero) doesn't make the most sense from an evolutionary perspective, it just seems to be an abnormal behavior that doesn't suit biological survival much
The laws of natural selection aren't some divine laws of moral character.

i read only half of the first page and im already cringing. i think i need to call the prince from katamari damacy to roll all u up so i can throw u in the trash collectively. im going to throw the entirety of the blf into a wastebin. im praying for you all - u and ur disgusting mouths of urs. god bless

Idk, being gay (or any significant deviation from hetero) doesn't make the most sense from an evolutionary perspective, it just seems to be an abnormal behavior that doesn't suit biological survival much

probably having the trait didn't cause too much of an adverse effect

I mean, I think it used to be that you would just reproduce anyway so humans would survive, but now we don't have a need for that anymore

i read only half of the first page and im already cringing. i think i need to call the prince from katamari damacy to roll all u up so i can throw u in the trash collectively. im going to throw the entirety of the blf into a wastebin. im praying for you all - u and ur disgusting mouths of urs. god bless

Well that isn't nice B)

Idk, being gay (or any significant deviation from hetero) doesn't make the most sense from an evolutionary perspective, it just seems to be an abnormal behavior that doesn't suit biological survival much
There's tons of conditions that exist that provide a negative affect towards survival, some in large population percentages. They still exist.
But I read somewhere, someone offered a possible explanation for this: Homoloveuality could be a recessive characteristic, while heterozygous individuals having some sort of advantage over the homozygous dominant. This would be the same as sickle cell anemia: heterozygousity for it gives a resistance against malaria.
There's also the idea that a small percentage of homoloveuality provides a protection against overpopulation
There's also plenty of homos who force themselves to live in a hetero relationship and have had children
« Last Edit: February 15, 2014, 06:33:23 PM by Headcrab Zombie »

Well that isn't nice B)
are u saying that if u had a bag of cat/dog stuff you wouldnt throw it away??? u would cuddle and cradle it like a lil baby and give it a little smooch too? u sayin i should give this fecal garbage some TLC? heck no pal

The laws of natural selection aren't some divine laws of moral character.

I didn't say it had moral implications, I just meant that its weird that it seems to be a persistent trait. I guess the recessive gene explanation that Headcrab said makes sense

no that's stupid. it doesn't matter what you think because it isn't opinion
it doesn't matter what they are to you though


I guess the recessive gene explanation that Headcrab said makes sense
Keep in mind it's just an idea

Badspot

  • Administrator
I don't really want to headbutt this particular hornets nest, but since I'm banning people I should probably say something.

I'm against all forms of bullstuff.  Yes, social justice warrior snowflake-ism is bullstuff - but so is dismissing whole classes of loveual preference as a unnatural mental illnesses.  I'd like to think there's a healthy middle ground somewhere between tumblr and the westboro baptist church.  

Specever is now permanently banned.  If you check out his profile you can see his signature which contains a celtic cross (the adopted symbol of the white power/neo national socialist organization stormfront) and the charming "coon" tag.  What a winner.  I honestly don't know how he flew under the radar for so long.  

you are an idiot
For what?
I know some people have vaginas, some have snakees, and a small percentage got forgeted up in getting one of the prior two.
And no one can tell me different, because
it doesn't matter what they are to you though
e.g. it doesn't matter what they are to you
you here means anyone who made up their own gender

kinda confused here

also, cool, badspot posted

I just meant that its weird that it seems to be a persistent trait. I guess the recessive gene explanation that Headcrab said makes sense
Whether loveual orientation is entirely physiological or not is still up for debate, but I like the idea that it shouldn't really matter and people should be allowed to do whatever they want in the bedroom as long as it's safe, sane, and consensual.

probably having the trait didn't cause too much of an adverse effect

I mean, I think it used to be that you would just reproduce anyway so humans would survive, but now we don't have a need for that anymore
So are saying that the there is no need for more people or that the practice of love just for procreation is outdated?