Author Topic: THE (RESTRICTION) OF RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS!  (Read 11139 times)

I don't like guns; honestly I just wish they never really existed. Though I'm for gun rights, because it doesn't help anyone to make guns illegal. Those who break the law are going to be the ones with guns, and those who follow essentially become defenseless targets.

I'm for gun rights, but this is just dumb.
how? they're both deadly if you're irresponsible or purposefully using them that way. I'm not really seeing a huge difference
Wait, you're okay with firearms.
Kinda surprised you're not having a seizure over how evil guns and the evil conservatives that want them are.
erm, why?

I stopped caring that people want to own guns.

One thing I do hate is asshats standing on crowded street corner with a fully loaded automatic rifle to "exercise their rights". People get rightfully scared, and the idiot wonders why the cops show up and say he's freaking people out. He could be contemplating opening fire for all they know.

Gather round children

Let ol' lego share his wisdom

If you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns.

In other words, only criminals will have guns, what do they care if it's against the law?

Civilians need a way to defend themselves against a criminal with a gun.

Gather round children

Let ol' lego share his wisdom

If you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns.

In other words, only criminals will have guns, what do they care if it's against the law?

Civilians need a way to defend themselves against a criminal with a gun.
So lets give them beanbag launchers

No, the firearm killed the person, the person pulling the trigger and aiming at the victim only helped it in doing so.

So in other words, guns can shoot all by themselves? The gun isn't the one deciding to kill people. It's like saying a sword went and killed someone with the help of a person. Instead, the person killed someone with the help of a gun/sword.

BTW, guns can't kill people. Bullets do.


>implying criminals who intentionally use firearms for illegal purposes will follow laws and regulation
>implying there aren't gangs and underground organizations who smuggle in firearms
>implying britain's true total crime rate (due to officials attempting to "reduce crime statistics" by literally wiping them off the table) hasn't drastically increased since the rise in restrictions of firearms
references:


the last one was mainly directed at furdle because his massive handicap mouth opened again, spewing gallons of handicapese bullstuff, and someone in the thread called for cleanup.

I honestly don't see why civilians would need assault rifles. I'm not anti gun, I'm just anti assault rifle.
« Last Edit: February 19, 2014, 07:41:32 PM by Funkadelic »

how about

why the forget would a civilian need an AR15

there you go
Recreational shooting, its fun to shoot fast at paper targets and inanimate objects.

people with guns kill people
People without guns kill people as well
Recreational shooting, its fun to shoot fast at paper targets and inanimate objects.
noo noo don't say that

you know as well as i do that guns only exist to kill people



why the forget would a civilian need an AR15


Because if we're attacked by those commie liberal russians muslims, what weapons can we defend ourselves with besides the word of God?

BTW, guns can't kill people. Bullets do.

blunt force trauma

I don't like guns; honestly I just wish they never really existed.
Same actually
I've also made a plot on how I'm going to go back in time and kill the people that invented gunpowder

Same actually
I've also made a plot on how I'm going to go back in time and kill the people that invented gunpowder
For some reason i can't picture this story actually working