because saying something is true 100% of the time then having it not work a single time invalidates the whole system. we operate on acceptable margins, p < .05, to say something is generally true. not everything works in absolutes in actual science.
i didn't say it was 100% true all of the time...
i was saying that you can have thousands of experiments and such that all point to the same conclusion but that isn't good enough for impossible standards
A Creationist created your MRI machine, so much for technology relying on the absolute law that technology can only go forward if you believe something exploded and you weren't there to see it.I diss all and any beliefs that attack other ones to promote how "right" they are.
NOBODY loving SAID THAT ARGHHGHGSRHGHGHGHGHH
BUT MRIs WORK BECAUSE OF THINGS WE CAN PROVE ARE THERE AND HOW THEY FUNCTION AND
i'm gonna cry
it's not. it's not exactly accurate either though. Basically, there are 17 different amino acids to chose from. 1st gets picked, huge chance of that. Second one getting picked, 1 to 289. If you continue on, until all the proteins have been picked, I'm pretty sure it's somewhere around 10152.
assuming that's true, you still have all the forgettons of planets and stars and stuff and all of the surfaces of the planets where the life could form at any second while also being constantly hit with the energy of the other stars...
> The face of the moon that faces the earth is full of craters, but the back side has relatively few in comparison. If the water ejecting from the Earth was powerful enough that some of it was able to actually exit the gravitational pull, it would have frozen on contact with the extremely low temperatures of space. There also would be nothing to slow it down. The crystals would be attracting each other by their own gravitational pulls (everything has some gravity) to form small frozen balls of ice, which would be pelting the moon.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wcxr6KTWIas&t=3m52s