Author Topic: supreme court struck down affirmative action 6-2  (Read 34688 times)

Otherwise known as a biased source.
*claps*
lol are you serious

lol are you serious
Thats what everyone else is wondering about you more specifically

Thats what everyone else is wondering about you more specifically
"everyone else" is a buncha white people who think racism doesn't exist anymore (unless it's against white people of course) so who cares

Because equal isn't equal unless you're on top, am I right?
Anybody who whines about this being stupid or tribal was a part of the stereotype and problem.

There should have never been "special arrangements" for any group of people.

"everyone else" is a buncha white people who think racism doesn't exist anymore (unless it's against white people of course) so who cares
i thought frankie was black



I'm trying to stay as neutral as possible. Might I ask how this is different from ignoring race in the context of an objective application?
it's not. that's what it is. it's used to force colleges and employers to not consider race in applications

lol are you serious
If you read very closely, there are clues that they are accepting on the basis of race, such as "increasing racial diversity." There's only one way to do that, and that's to accept more minority races.

You ninja'd me when I was last on a page. Really, when you're on your own in an argument against LITERALLY EVERYBODY ELSE INVOLVED, you know you're wrong.
"everyone else" is a buncha white people who think racism doesn't exist anymore (unless it's against white people of course) so who cares
...so you're going to be tribal by dismissing our arguments on the basis that we're
a buncha white people.

I recognize that racism exists - both ways - but you don't fight racism with more loving racism.

i thought frankie was black
my ass is whiter than sour cream

it's not. that's what it is

uhm

so everyone is flipping out over the wikipedia definition because it seems patronizing, rather than what it actually means in context

ok

God damn.

Because a pissing match is going in, my post is overlooked.
Thanks a lot you guys...

I sent this to all the kids in my school's directed studies classes

mfw they all respond


communism also seemed pretty good on paper too but it didnt work out too well

example:i mean that's pretty stuffty
People have to be morons if they want to live under communism. Under communism the government controls all means of production and social services, personal ownership of items is outlawed, and you basically live an ant worker. Everything you do has to benefit the home country at the expense of the individual.

Democratic Socialism on the other hand is where the government provides social services such as education, running water, electricity, telephone just like communist one would while having many of benefits of a capitalsit democratic nation where some industrys can remain private and can still compete. It requires that everyone give in to recieve. Yet if no works and earns income to pay their taxes, but instead takes advantage of the systems and leeches of it. Which in turns increases taxes to cover the expenses of the leeches, which can destroy businesses that don't want to pay their workers more, which creates more leeches, which creates angry people. Then it craps out and collapses on itself.

[img]http://static.gamespot.com/uploads/scale_small/1535/15354834/2438326-laughing-hysterically.gif[/img ]
is that one the one who flew over the coocoo nest or whatever