holy stuff all im trying to loving say, is that people should stop loving complaining about a game that didn't "hold up to its hype", because developers always always loving overhype their games no matter what.
if buyers fall for the hype, it was their buying decision. im saying that buyers should be well informed on what they're trying to buy and know what the game reall turns out to be rather than what its supposed to be
It is now worthless to argue with you because your point is immediately void.
thanks, don't want to argue with someone that doesn't even comprehend what i'm saying
Now you're just victim blaming.
im not victim blaming, im saying that buyers should be smart enough to understand that games almost never live up to their hype, and research before buying. the buyer is not the victim; watch dogs simply presented their game in the best way possible, to promote their game, rather the buyers use rash decision making and put themselves to lose when they buy a game based off hype.
To reiterate my message more clearly:
That's not what he's saying. He hasn't accepted mediocrity. He's saying that people should stop being so uninformed, so they don't buy games they won't like. Guess what happens when people don't buy games that have problems? The games companies stop doing stupid stuff and releasing broken games. However, if you preordered something like watch dogs and are upset because it has bugs/issues, that's your own problem. The devs already have your money, they don't care any more. He's actually saying to do the opposite of accepting mediocrity, but none of you are seeing the point.
thanks treynolds
