Poll

MEWTWO!!!

YES I'M GETTING HIM TONIGHT
35 (36.8%)
I'M GETTING HIM LATER CUZ I DIDN'T GET BOTH VERSIONS LOL WHOOPS
15 (15.8%)
forget MEWTWO DLC SUCKS U TATER TOT TITTY
14 (14.7%)
I ALREADY GOT HIM WITH MELEE LOL forget U SCRUBLORDS
31 (32.6%)

Total Members Voted: 95

Author Topic: Super Smash Bros. For Wii U & 3DS: MEWTWO CODES GOIN OUT  (Read 590497 times)

so do you guys think there will be no new characters, dlc, or the wii u/3ds connect theory
I believe in the Wiiu/3ds connect theory, and I'll only believe character DLC if it's free. Because I know Sakurai prefers fairness and balance and having brand new characters that you have to pay extra for would just be very unusual.
« Last Edit: September 11, 2014, 06:11:58 PM by CreamTurk3y »

Have you ever considered that you might not be called out for being stupid if you didn't do stupid things? Maybe you should try that.
at least i didn't defend the act of linking to child research
but again, knock it off taboo seriously

you stop and i'll stop

at least i didn't defend the act of linking to child research
You know what's incredible? Your incredible tunnel vision. Despite multiple people telling you that that is not what happened, you still insist that's the case. I don't know how someone could have such perfect stupidity.

holy stuff kimon's on a troll frenzy

is he forum suiciding or something


You know what's incredible? Your incredible tunnel vision. Despite multiple people telling you that that is not what happened, you still insist that's the case. I don't know how someone could have such perfect stupidity.
taboo, on the tumblr megathread, you literally said "anita sarkeesian did nothing wrong" after i said that she linked to an account with child research. what am i supposed to take that as?

holy stuff kimon's on a troll frenzy

is he forum suiciding or something
all we can do is hope
edit: kimon she didn't loving directly link to the goddamn account, she posted a picture with the account name on it

all we can do is hope
edit: kimon she didn't loving directly link to the goddamn account, she posted a picture with the account name on it
that is still directing her audience to the account? she caused people to see it. therefore it's her fault. why people consistently defend this is beyond me.

taboo, on the tumblr megathread, you literally said "anita sarkeesian did nothing wrong" after i said that she linked to an account with child research.
Which you and apparently countless others did for the same reason: Trying to get someone in trouble. Does that mean every time someone reports someone for child research distribution they should be taken in too? What are- Yes, you are handicapped, what am I even doing posing it as a question anymore?

what am i supposed to take that as?
How do I explain common sense to someone who is incapable of proper thinking? I really can't be bothered to even attempt it.

that is still directing her audience to the account? she caused people to see it. therefore it's her fault. why people consistently defend this is beyond me.
Just like you did! Along with countless others! Tunnel vision at its finest, folks!

taboo you are literally ridiculous i can't COUNT how many times i have told you "i linked to her twitter when the child research was down" and that she showed an account that posted child research UNNECESSARILY which caused people to see child research. i mean what the forget man.


taboo you are literally ridiculous i can't COUNT how many times i have told you "i linked to her twitter when the child research was down" and that she showed an account that posted child research UNNECESSARILY which caused people to see child research. i mean what the forget man.
that's partially the viewers fault because she WAS reporting the account for cp and the viewers turn around and view it anyways

that's partially the viewers fault because she WAS reporting the account for cp and the viewers turn around and view it anyways
"well i don't HAVE to show the name of the account posting child research to my literally gigantic audience. better do it anyways, it'll just be their fault"

"well i don't HAVE to show the name of the account posting child research to my literally gigantic audience. better do it anyways, it'll just be their fault"

Guys, can you please take this stuff out of here? This isn't where it belongs.