Maybe because you shoved hamhost down our throats whenever you got the chance
That was last year. I quit the aggressive advertising after I launched HammerHost. Here you go with the misconceptions again. Like I said only a few minutes ago:
the community bounded
back to their old 2012 views on Hammereditor and Pacnet.
Why are you a robot stuck to your 2013 opinions?
Plus well, let's face it, having a hosting service from home with lots of traffic isn't too reliable.
Another misconception; the home connection quality was indistinguishable from a data center connection, from the average Blockland player's point of view. There was not a
single point in time when the quality suffered from home use. It was doing completely fine until it got
DDoS'd, which not even RTB could defend against.
This is the main reason I've given up on defending my hosting service: forumers like you don't think for themselves but jump onto bandwagons in order to collect reputation. The whole forums are a reputation game. "Of course I know HammerHost had downtime because it was attacked, not because of the ISP, but I'll blame Hammereditor for using a connection with a
proven¹ lack of quality. That way I can gain a reputation point!".
¹ proven by the
accurate community, of course.
