Author Topic: Five Nights at Freddy's 1 and 2 and also 3 I think  (Read 345803 times)

the developer just said that the game is not a prequel you guys

HOLY stuff WAIT. The check at the end of night five read 1987. The same year as the bite. Maybe FNAF 2 takes place before FNAF, and the one that bit a kid was the mangle. Just think about it. There is no mention of the killer of the five children in the sequel. It is mentioned though, that someone used a yellow freddy fazbear suit. This might be the suit used by the killer. In the newspapers in the first game, parents noticed blood and mucus on the animatronics. Maybe the animatronics that had the blood and mucus on them, the ones that the killer used to hide the bodies, were the toy animatronics. And after the bodies were found, the toy animatronics (and the mangle because of the bite) were disposed of by Fazbear's Pizzeria. To replace them, they repaired the older ones and put them on stage. This also explains why the phone guy is still alive. It makes sense because on night 6, the phone guy says he'll do the night shift next. Then after the phone guy got killed, (right before FNAF 1) They hired Mike. This theory also makes sense when you see that The Puppet was in front of freddy in that cutscene that took place in the FNAF 1 building.

Then after the phone guy got killed, (right before FNAF 1) They hired Mike.
then who was mike talking to in FNAF1

then who was mike talking to in FNAF1
It was a recording you dingus. You can hear the phone guy getting killed on the night 4 recording in FNAF 1.

the developer just said that the game is not a prequel you guys
Dang I was hoping for a game theory on this

HOLY stuff WAIT. The check at the end of night five read 1987. The same year as the bite. Maybe FNAF 2 takes place before FNAF, and the one that bit a kid was the mangle. Just think about it. There is no mention of the killer of the five children in the sequel. It is mentioned though, that someone used a yellow freddy fazbear suit. This might be the suit used by the killer. In the newspapers in the first game, parents noticed blood and mucus on the animatronics. Maybe the animatronics that had the blood and mucus on them, the ones that the killer used to hide the bodies, were the toy animatronics. And after the bodies were found, the toy animatronics (and the mangle because of the bite) were disposed of by Fazbear's Pizzeria. To replace them, they repaired the older ones and put them on stage. This also explains why the phone guy is still alive. It makes sense because on night 6, the phone guy says he'll do the night shift next. Then after the phone guy got killed, (right before FNAF 1) They hired Mike. This theory also makes sense when you see that The Puppet was in front of freddy in that cutscene that took place in the FNAF 1 building.

If the game theory (i have been watching them a lot lately) is correct then this is a dream and we all know time doesn't need to be real I dreams

It was a recording you dingus. You can hear the phone guy getting killed on night 4 in FNAF 1.
Geez sorry for not being a total FNAF-geek.
But seriously this is a sequel.

the developer just said that the game is not a prequel you guys
sauce

Geez sorry for not being a total FNAF-geek.
But seriously this is a sequel.
I'm sorry for being edgy and calling you a dingus. It seems like my theory is about to crumble.

EDIT: Spoilers: video of golden freddy. It appears that you're not supposed to use the mask while he's there, because he slowly faded away and killed him when he used the mask.
« Last Edit: November 11, 2014, 07:52:27 PM by blueblur121 »


If it's not a prequel then how is it in 1987. FNAF 1 is clearly not in 1987 because the phone guy referred to the bite as "the bite of '87".

It was a recording you dingus. You can hear the phone guy getting killed on the night 4 recording in FNAF 1.
scott is devoloping this by himself like a loving edgy vigilante hobo so he has to do all of the voice acting so hes the phone guy both in fnaf 1 and 2

If it's not a prequel then how is it in 1987. FNAF 1 is clearly not in 1987 because the phone guy referred to the bite as "the bite of '87".
If the game theory (i have been watching them a lot lately) is correct then this is a dream and we all know time doesn't need to be real I dreams

the developer just said that the game is not a prequel you guys
evidence please
can't find that anywhere

oh wait

evidence please
can't find that anywhere

we also know it's him so don't ask
I'm mostly curious about that cutscene where you're in old Freddy's POV, looking at old Chica and old Bonnie.
I wonder what Freddy is thinking, and if his consciousness is still in his new suit.
« Last Edit: November 11, 2014, 07:59:07 PM by Vinska »


Yeah, that game theory is bullstuff. If it was all Mike's dream, then how come Mike isn't the protagonist in this one?



Oh, and another thing that supports my theory. It says the previous night gaurd was moved to the day shift...

*Phoenix Wright music*

BUT MIKE GOT FIRED ON NIGHT SEVEN.

Yeah, that game theory is bullstuff. If it was all Mike's dream, then how come Mike isn't the protagonist in this one?



Oh, and another thing that supports my theory. It says the previous night gaurd was moved to the day shift...

*pheonix wright music*

BUT MIKE GOT FIRED ON NIGHT SEVEN.
it has been stated that in fnaf1 nights 7 and 6 were non canonical