"Hatred" Most likely the most edgiest game ever announced!

[lordician]

I think the only reason people hate this game is because of the edgelord in the beginning.
I bet you if they cut that out people wouldn't be like this. 100%. Infact, I wouldn't see so many numbers. A lot of people say that it's being made by a 12 year old just because of the character, and that the story sucks. The game isn't even loving out.

What about the cutscene kind of thingies where you see the main guy slicing throats and shooting them merciless in the head when they beg you for mercy? :S
Those parts were just too much for me.
Together with the intro, setting the 'mood' for the rest of the game.

[Ad Bot]

[Dodger]

I think the only reason people hate this game is because of the edgelord in the beginning.
I bet you if they cut that out people wouldn't be like this. 100%. Infact, I wouldn't see so many numbers. A lot of people say that it's being made by a 12 year old just because of the character, and that the story sucks. The game isn't even loving out.

The game dev is advertising the game as such

Therefore, we can put our opinions on the game and dev based on what I know. The trailer was meant to be edgy as forget (albeit stupid and juvenile, hence the 12 year old claim). It's up to the dev to prove otherwise

[Legoboss]

I think a lot the reason people don't like the game is because it kinda depicts what people already do in free roaming games. Sure, it's gory, and there is no other goal then to kill, but it looks like an ok game. One scene shows walls collapsing and a few destructible things, so if this was cheap, I would probably play it, as the cop fights look rather interesting. But anyways back to the point bluh i'm bad at this opinion thing. This game just shows what people do a lot in sandbox games with guns, but it's actually telling you to do it. In GTA, you kill tons of civs, and I HIGHLY doubt anyone went any one of those games without killing one person. This one is just telling you to do it, and people go all "ehh but its so violent!!111!," it just seems like they don't want to admit that they do these things already.
Dunno, just my opinion.
Besides, the dev seems to be treating it like a joke game.

[Plastiware]

Personally, I don't mind the edgelord dude even if it is cheesy as hell.  Nor do I mind that it's basically taking what players do in sandbox games anyway and making it the objective.  What gets to me is the fact that your primary goal is slaughtering innocent civilians as they scream and beg for mercy.  There's a certain line, and this clearly crosses it.  Context is incredibly important.  Other games focus on large-scale slaughter, but there's always a clear reason they're your adversaries.  Even in games like GTA, killing civilians is neither your goal nor is it played with a great deal of seriousness or sympathy.  This is dead-serious murdering of innocents, in a context that even plays up their innocence, sympathy, and desire to live, and it's loving horrible.  Hell, at this point they might as well throw in killable children and pets, because why not go all the way, right?

[otto-san]

preface: i remain solidly on my stance that video games are a medium of entertainment and a media art, and so i base my opinions on the same basis of a movie or a book, taking into account the respective advantages of each media. this is not about why it's not for me in a game, this is about why it's not for me period.

i'm completely ok with violent video games and the reason why i'm not okay with this is not because it's violent or because it's going to turn people into psychopathic killers (that's just ridiculous no matter what way you want to abstract it jesus christ). the reason why i'm personally not okay with this is because it's just too intense for me. like a roller coaster or a scary movie. i don't know how well i'd be able to handle mercilessly slaughtering people that very realistically beg for mercy and then very realistically are killed in many creative ways. it just don't sit right with me. i don't think this is any different from avoiding a similar movie or television show for the exact reason. some people will like it, and that's theirs to keep, but the content is not for me.

[ResonKinetic]

Hell, at this point they might as well throw in killable children and pets, because why not go all the way, right?

dude that'd be great

and add rape for good measure

[Rigel]

The edginess of this game almost cut my eyes in half.

[LeetZero]

Replace all the people with zombies or aliens and suddenly everything is morally fine.
Jesus loving Christ people.

I am buying this game tho, looks fun.

[ResonKinetic]

Replace all the people with zombies or aliens and suddenly everything is morally fine.
Jesus loving Christ people.

I am buying this game tho, looks fun.

lol no you're a loving handicap for saying that and you know it

[Davy]

that was uncomfortable

[otto-san]

Replace all the people with zombies or aliens and suddenly everything is morally fine.
Jesus loving Christ people.

absolutely more so, yes. this makes plenty of sense since human life is generally more valuable to humans. even though zombies would technically be human, they're not really seen as a human life unless the game actively develops them as such. 'aliens' is p vague but a human look-alike breed of alien would probs be just as bad. not that killing things is really okay to do at all, but comon man

[ResonKinetic]

absolutely more so, yes. this makes plenty of sense since human life is generally more valuable to humans. even though zombies would technically be human, they're not really seen as a human life unless the game actively develops them as such. 'aliens' is p vague but a human look-alike breed of alien would probs be just as bad. not that killing things is really okay to do at all, but comon man

zombies are irrelevant; it's sad that they are no longer human and that they have to be put down in general

if the aliens are just as sapient as humans and are begging for mercy and the game glorifies your killing them, that's pretty god-damn horrible too.

so yeah

[LeetZero]

absolutely more so, yes. this makes plenty of sense since human life is generally more valuable to humans. even though zombies would technically be human, they're not really seen as a human life unless the game actively develops them as such. 'aliens' is p vague but a human look-alike breed of alien would probs be just as bad. not that killing things is really okay to do at all, but comon man

zombies are irrelevant; it's sad that they are no longer human and that they have to be put down in general

if the aliens are just as sapient as humans and are begging for mercy and the game glorifies your killing them, that's pretty god-damn horrible too.

so yeah

So apparently any death of a human in a game is horrible.
Otto made a bit of sense until the part of killing things in general being bad. In a game.
Ok. I'm done. I'm so loving done.

[ZSNO]

So apparently any death of a human in a game is horrible.
Otto made a bit of sense until the part of killing things in general being bad. In a game.
Ok. I'm done. I'm so loving done.

K bye, you will not be missed, just like those virtual innocent people you're going to willingfully kill.

[otto-san]

So apparently any death of a human in a game is horrible.
Otto made a bit of sense until the part of killing things in general being bad. In a game.
Ok. I'm done. I'm so loving done.

lol calm down

i said that because i could imagine people getting worked up because i was saying killing things was ok