Crown's Jailbreak [Christmas Event!]

[TheBlackParrot]

maybe instead, use a /voteskip command to skip the current warden and restart?
would only last until 8:00 and has to be >=75% majority

[Ad Bot]

[Meta_KnightX]

Great idea. And Admin or SAs should be able to manually skip the warden.

[KickFlow]

just SA

Also another great idea would be to host it tonight.

[Brikichu]

maybe instead, use a /voteskip command to skip the current warden and restart?
would only last until 8:00 and has to be >=75% majority

what if prisoners intentionally vote to skip wardens who are good so they can get stuffty wardens that they can easily overwhelm? what if players have no ability to improve themselves as warden because they made a bad first impression and are constantly skipped over? imo the system should just be left as is, but there should be a blacklist for admins to put stuffty wardens on and they're not allowed to be warden. you'd only go on this list though if you really forgeted up badly, not minor things (unless if it's like a bunch of minor things that equal a big forget up), and you can appeal it if you can give a legitimate reason for why you forgeted up, otherwise you're on it forever.

[Insert Name Here]

what if prisoners intentionally vote to skip wardens who are good so they can get stuffty wardens that they can easily overwhelm? what if players have no ability to improve themselves as warden because they made a bad first impression and are constantly skipped over? imo the system should just be left as is, but there should be a blacklist for admins to put stuffty wardens on and they're not allowed to be warden. you'd only go on this list though if you really forgeted up badly, not minor things (unless if it's like a bunch of minor things that equal a big forget up), and you can appeal it if you can give a legitimate reason for why you forgeted up, otherwise you're on it forever.

Then make the command Moderator, Admin, Sa and Host only

[Ravencroft·]

Considering the server is only hosted when admins are on, you can just kick bad wardens. No need for all that extra stuff.

[TheBlackParrot]

what if prisoners intentionally vote to skip wardens who are good so they can get stuffty wardens that they can easily overwhelm? what if players have no ability to improve themselves as warden because they made a bad first impression and are constantly skipped over? imo the system should just be left as is, but there should be a blacklist for admins to put stuffty wardens on and they're not allowed to be warden. you'd only go on this list though if you really forgeted up badly, not minor things (unless if it's like a bunch of minor things that equal a big forget up), and you can appeal it if you can give a legitimate reason for why you forgeted up, otherwise you're on it forever.

would only last until 8:00 and has to be >=75% majority

why do you think i mentioned this

[Ravencroft·]

why do you think i mentioned this

A lot of the people that play don't have the mental capacity to make an educated decision, and instead just join in on the fun. Happens all the time with votekick. 10/11 players vote to kick a completely innocent guy. The only way that would work is if it was absolute consensus, and even then the vote might not be completely justified.

Also requiring that much time played for someone to be warden would be useless. 2 hours time played is understandable, but if someone can't figure it out by then, they probably should be warden in the first place. All that would do is discourage players who just joined the server.

[Crøwn]

Requiring 24 hours won't help and I realize that now. I've said it before but the only way we're going to get better wardens is if more people have experience playing the server so they can figure out different things to do with the prisoners and then others can learn from the wardens who've got it figured out. It seems like it's just going to take time to get the server in a better state. That's why I'd like to host as much as possible but how the server currently is code wise I feel uneasy leaving it by itself.
After I have gotten the code to a place where I feel it's almost bug free I will code in a system and I've mapped it out like this:
All admins+ will be able to join the server while it's passworded and have the ability to "open" the server.
When the last admin leaves it will start a 10 minute timer to shut down the server unless another admin connects.
The idea behind this would be an admin would join and host for a couple hours and then maybe find another one to continue, I'd want the admin to host for a least 2 hours or work with another admin that could.

Also I have added /startVote for wardens and admins which lets them have a server wide poll for everyone to vote on. Warden can use it for games, admins can use it for admin stuff.
I made /skipWarden too for Admins+ which is self explanatory, skips the warden to the next one.

As for the /voteSkip for skipping a warden, I'm with Brikichu, people would just skip good ones or do it anyway. People tend to hop on the vote bandwagon when they're presented with votes.



Oh and I'm sorry we couldn't host the past two nights I've been busy but I'm hoping to host on Wednesday and Thursday.

[TheLeaderOfTheRebellion]

there are a few of your admins that could host on today

[Crøwn]

Server is open.

[Crøwn]

The server got a runtime error, sorry. I forgot when I got a new server I didn't replace the blockland.exe with Zeblote's fix so I went ahead and did that for next time. I will host tomorrow and most likely friday too.

[Kyuande]

Sweet

[bigcapitalbaka]

Sweet

[Crøwn]

Ok server is open, I replaced the Machete back to the butterfly knife in the shop.