Poll

Your view?

It's good
149 (90.9%)
It's bad
15 (9.1%)

Total Members Voted: 164

Author Topic: Australia releases "no jab, no pay" policy  (Read 9454 times)

Except it is, because your child spread it. Your child spread it to others, causing bodily harm and possibly death, because you didn't want to take a couple hours to go get a harmless injection
This is like saying me driving a gas guzzler truck is ripping a whole in the ozone melting the ice in antarctica and killing off indigenous polar bears

This is not directly sourced to me

Even if vaccines would cause autism, I'd still use them.
I'd rather have an autistic child than a loving dead one!

Why the hell would you make that choice? "Protecting my children and society as a whole from dangerous diseases is an option, but I GUESS I WONT DO IT HAHAHAHA" like seriously wtf. And I think your mixing up "socialist regime" with "totalitarian regime".
Because people have the freedom to choose

It will never be your place to make that decision for them and pushing them by tax restrictions is unjustified just for not doing it your way

It's not that vaccinations are bad; it's the concept of it. Forcing parents to inject their child with something can be seriously abused. There should be incentives to vaccinate your children, not punishments for not.

This is like saying me driving a gas guzzler truck is ripping a whole in the ozone melting the ice in antarctica and killing off indigenous polar bears

This is not directly sourced to me
it's not directly sourced to you, but you are supporting anti-vaccination groups, which is not the brightest thing to do
Because people have the freedom to choose
not vaccinating your child is somewhat like conspiring to become a serial killer

This is like saying me driving a gas guzzler truck is ripping a whole in the ozone melting the ice in antarctica and killing off indigenous polar bears

This is not directly sourced to me
It's not at all like saying that, your tanks of gas alone do not kill the polar bears, everyones as a collective does. It's different because if your child directly spreads it to someone else because you refused to get a vaccine, and that child that had the disease spread to them sustains bodily harm or death, you are the one at fault.

Forcing parents to inject their child with something can be seriously abused.
But that something is completely harmless, the bill wouldn't be passed if they were making you inject your child with something bad

it's not directly sourced to you, but you are supporting anti-vaccination groups, which is not the brightest thing to donot vaccinating your child is somewhat like conspiring to become a serial killer

No, it's not, that's tremendously radical

It's not at all like saying that, your tanks of gas alone do not kill the polar bears, everyones as a collective does. It's different because if your child directly spreads it to someone else because you refused to get a vaccine, and that child that had the disease spread to them sustains bodily harm or death, you are the one at fault.
But that something is completely harmless, the bill wouldn't be passed if they were making you inject your child with something bad
Collectively everyone who didn't vaccinate their children, caused it spread to the native population

No, it's not, that's tremendously radical
They both harm people. Being a serial killer is just with the added intent to do that.

well im against it normally. but poor pieces of stuff whom beg and live off of other peoples tax money shouldnt have a choice in anything at all.

But that something is completely harmless, the bill wouldn't be passed if they were making you inject your child with something bad

I'm saying I don't like that it forces parents to inject their children with something that the government chooses.


They both harm people. Being a serial killer is just with the added intent to do that.
We all pay taxes to go into government to kill west asian civilians every day so i suppose we're all serial killers
« Last Edit: April 12, 2015, 01:39:48 PM by Kansas »

Collectively everyone who didn't vaccinate their children, caused it spread to the native population
Wtf does england colonizing the natives land have to do with this

I'm saying I don't like that it forces parents to inject their children with something that the government chooses what they should be injected with.
It's technically not the government, but the medical associations. They made the MMR vaccine.

"If your religion is against it your religion is stupid"

We're done here

What religion do you follow that bans vaccinations?

But that something is completely harmless, the bill wouldn't be passed if they were making you inject your child with something bad

Well now let's say that a vaccine is released with bad side effects or a high chance of allergies. Parents are apparently forced to go through with it anyway or lose their healthcare.