Australia releases "no jab, no pay" policy

[General]

Lol I agree with freedom too, but also accept that government is not willing to pay for damages caused by your bullstuff decision not to vaccinate your child.

[Ad Bot]

[Kansas]

Lol I agree with freedom too, but also accept that government is not willing to pay for damages caused by your bullstuff decision not to vaccinate your child.

It's not like that here.

[General]

It's not like that here.

Oh yeah I forgot, in America you pay for your own damages caused by your bullstuff decision not to vaccinate your child.

Sorry.

[Machaty]

Then don't try to get me to debate with you? Which post are you referring to?

No need to be rude, I just didn't want to debate, a lot of them were logical.

Right there in black and white. I wasn't trying to get you to debate with me, but you said you didn't want to debate, and then when I brought up the fact that you were debating for like 7 pages you started trying to debate again. Seems a bit contradictory.

[·::Kishgal::·]

Simply speaking, anyone who disagrees with this is an idiot.
I guess Hotline Miami 2 is a worthy sacrifice for this.

[Harm94]

What does a government have to gain by killing their population with a poorly made vaccine? Some corporation looking for a quick buck then maybe, but not a government. I think we have come a long way in creating safer medicines and vaccines.

Remember 10 years ago things like Small pox and measles were things that we didn't have worry about, people living in a time before electricity worried about those things. Now we are seeing diseases coming back and these use to be diseases that we took for granted as things we would never see again. I don't know about you, but I don't want to see black plague v2 spread because of ignorance.

[Headcrab Zombie]

I believe in freedom of choice.

But there is no choice to make because vaccinations do zero harm and not vaccinating causes harm at zero benefit to anyone

[General]

Remember, vaccines do not always prevent everyone from contracting a disease, they massively lower the risk of contracting a disease. Also, they reduce the intensity of a disease if you catch it.

[General]

do zero harm

There is always a risk of harm but it's much lower than the risk of catching the disease you are being vaccined for.

[Headcrab Zombie]

There is always a risk of harm but it's much lower than the risk of catching the disease you are being vaccined for.

The only risk of harm is in individuals with rare medical conditions that make vaccinations a risk.
People with these conditions are exempt from this requirement

[Machaty]

There is always a risk of harm but it's much lower than the risk of catching the disease you are being vaccined for.

Care to explain? I don't really see how an inactive form of the flu virus can harm you

[Kansas]

Right there in black and white. I wasn't trying to get you to debate with me, but you said you didn't want to debate, and then when I brought up the fact that you were debating for like 7 pages you started trying to debate again. Seems a bit contradictory.

I actually have no idea what you're talking about.

Oh yeah I forgot, in America you pay for your own damages caused by your bullstuff decision not to vaccinate your child.

Sorry.

You would pay for it to if your child died, this isn't much about government ethics as someone's morale, and I would be devastated, I might kill myself.

[General]

Sigh, I'm not going to debate about this... Even normal people have a slight risk... Though obviously people with medical conditions that compromise the immune system would be at higher risk.

[General]

Would you pay for it if your child already contracted the disease? Oh wait, too late, all you can do is cry about it.

[Ipquarx]

Care to explain? I don't really see how an inactive form of the flu virus can harm you

If you have an immune deficiency the virus can actually harm you, and in some rare cases there are other side effects, though it's not entirely understood what actually causes it.