Author Topic: Feminists Play Grand Theft Auto.  (Read 23363 times)

Why can't you address what I've said
I already addressed it. Its equality for both genders because women just want to be equal to men. Including ending the idea that men have to be masculine and women have to be feminine.

you people scare me with your ignorance.
^
Women are often paid less than men. There is currently a 20-25% pay gap, that's pretty not ok.

I'm feeling a vibe here where people are mixing up the feminational socialists/idiot "feminists" you only see on the internet with level headed feminists you see in real life. Feminism seems to get a bad name because of the loud skanks who have made the term pretty much toxic. I would be considered a feminist because I believe for women to be completely equal to men. (You could say I'm biased because I grew up with two sisters.)

I had to get this out I'm so sorry please don't burn me alive

Poor women. Their lives are so hard and unfair.

^
Women are often paid less than men. There is currently a 20-25% pay gap, that's pretty not ok.
im pretty sure people have been over the fact that this statistic is based off of what jobs women take, their career choices, and how often they ask for raises (etc. etc.) and not a conscious decision to pay women less that male cohorts for the same job. if you believe that stuff you are playing right into the hands of crusty politicians who dont actually give a forget about women's rights.
I'm feeling a vibe here where people are mixing up the feminational socialists/idiot "feminists" you only see on the internet with level headed feminists you see in real life. Feminism seems to get a bad name because of the loud skanks who have made the term pretty much toxic. I would be considered a feminist because I believe for women to be completely equal to men. (You could say I'm biased because I grew up with two sisters.)
if the feminists you speak of were not teenagers with no real skill for argument building, or an actual ability to avoid being manipulated into believing false stuff (see above) then i'd say you got it backwards. "real life feminists" are often as vanilla and basic as you can get, especially western/white-centric feminism. you hardly ever see any mention of anyone other that cisgendered white women and, again, misguided efforts for equality in real life. though they have more credibility, they are certainly not better than 'le feminational socialists' on the internet which is why so many people say it's flawed.

Like most things, only the extreme feminist get seen because they're the ones causing trouble. I'm a feminist, and I really just want things equal.
A TRUE Scotsman does not eat sugar with their porridge.



Extreme or not, they're still feminists.

^
Women are often paid less than men. There is currently a 20-25% pay gap, that's pretty not ok.

we went over thees

https://youtu.be/BDj_bN0L8XM

A TRUE Scotsman does not eat sugar with their porridge.



Extreme or not, they're still feminists.
well actually they're not once they go over the line of hating men.

A TRUE Scotsman does not eat sugar with their porridge.



Extreme or not, they're still feminists.
what the forget is this kind of backwards logic

you're changing the definition to what you want to fit it in order to condemn an entire group

i'm tired of this myopic garbage logic, definitions do not just change because you want them to change.

I already addressed it. Its equality for both genders because women just want to be equal to men. Including ending the idea that men have to be masculine and women have to be feminine.
That sentence somewhat contradicts itself.

Why don't feminists fight for lets say equal jail time for the same crime, who gets custody, ect? I've never once heard a feminist be upset about a mans problem but expect everyone to be upset about theirs.


Women are often paid less than men. There is currently a 20-25% pay gap, that's pretty not ok.
I lold
This isn't the 70's, bud.
Wanna cite your source on this?

well actually they're not once they go over the line of hating men.

that's third wave feminism.

it's better for you to say you support equality and forgo mentioning feminism at all. it is what it is now.

what the forget is this kind of backwards logic

you're changing the definition to what you want to fit it in order to condemn an entire group

i'm tired of this myopic garbage logic, definitions do not just change because you want them to change.
*goes up to prominent feminist leader that is widely accepted by the mainstream but evidently a very stuffty person*

"hey, guess what... you're totally gonna laugh about this but as it turns out you're NOT a feminist... like i know you're representing us and all and being accepted while doing it but just hear me out"

*goes up to prominent feminist leader that is widely accepted by the mainstream but evidently a very stuffty person*

"hey, guess what... you're totally gonna laugh about this but as it turns out you're NOT a feminist... like i know you're representing us and all and being accepted while doing it but just hear me out"
people may have feminist ideals without being a card-carrying zealot. saying that an entire group is stuff because some windbags make it seem so is moronic.

it's also because the definition of feminism (circa, i dunno, in every other normal human conversation except the internet, apparently) is for women to have the same rights of men. if they hold beliefs that go any further into the man-hate range then they're no longer feminist ideals.

people may have feminist ideals without being a card-carrying zealot. saying that an entire group is stuff because some windbags make it seem so is moronic.
this argument is getting pretty old, if most of the key ideals in the movement are flawed the movement itself is flawed.

again speaking of western feminism here, some places need it so desperately that it's not worth criticizing.

this argument is getting pretty old, if most of the key ideals in the movement are flawed the movement itself is flawed.
well it's a good loving thing they aren't key ideals, because people irl whom i would consider feminists (and generally people with feminist beliefs who arent tumblr-cigarettes or online richard-swishers) don't consider men to be the spawn of the devil.

your online cherry-picked circlejerk articles don't reflect reality, buddy.

this argument is getting pretty old, if most of the key ideals in the movement are flawed the movement itself is flawed.

again speaking of western feminism here, some places need it so desperately that it's not worth criticizing.

maybe we're viewing the arguement wrong

what if the key ideals we're talking about are actually what we've been seeing from the extremists exclusively

^
Women are often paid less than men. There is currently a 20-25% pay gap, that's pretty not ok.

I'm feeling a vibe here where people are mixing up the feminational socialists/idiot "feminists" you only see on the internet with level headed feminists you see in real life. Feminism seems to get a bad name because of the loud skanks who have made the term pretty much toxic. I would be considered a feminist because I believe for women to be completely equal to men. (You could say I'm biased because I grew up with two sisters.)

I had to get this out I'm so sorry please don't burn me alive


oh and I'll back this guy, by the way, yes, the wage gap exists

and if not that, other countries have lots of problems with women