I appreciate the graph, I really do, but I do not think it is entirely relevant. The information in the graph is true, if everything but the platform is constant. However, that is not typically the case. The only point I was making is that it is entirely possible for a good player on console to have the same skill/accuracy as a decent player on PC. Do you agree to this?
Definitely possible. The entire point of the graphs was to represent the fact that if you control for all other variables besides platform, that's the result that comes out. It is entirely possible yes, and I'm sure that if we were to actually hold a competition with professional players it would be a damn close match, and both sides would have a sizable chance of winning due to all the thousands of other variables that aren't accounted for. The question, as far as I was concerned, was which one was objectionably better, not which humans are better than eachother, which is as far as I'm concerned, completely random.