Author Topic: "(Racially) segregated classrooms improve learning" - Anita Sarkeesian  (Read 6440 times)

feminism is about men and women being treated equally
woah,,, not so FAST there buckaroo,, what about all the feminists that believe there are more than 2 genders? they would call you a fake feminist for that, would they not??

Because feminism is mainly a clusterforget of contradicting branches and ideologies, there is no set goal or meaning for feminism. And never did I say you were not a feminist, I'm only saying that if you cannot accept your movement for what it is, then you are not worthy of the label of 'feminist'. For example, I disagree with just about everything Westboro Baptist promotes as far as religious politics, but I do not dismiss them as 'non-Christians.'
you did it again


you did it again
Again, even though you may still identify yourself a feminist, you are not worthy of the title. Please keep up.

Again, even though you may still identify yourself a feminist, you are not worthy of the title. Please keep up.
i am keeping up, you just keep contradicting yourself.

Again, even though you may still identify yourself a feminist, you are not worthy of the title. Please keep up.

Just when I thought you've reached the apex of your idiotic nonsense, you post again

You're a joke

woah,,, not so FAST there buckaroo,, what about all the feminists that believe there are more than 2 genders? they would call you a fake feminist for that, would they not??

would it be the "real" feminists calling the feminists that believe there are more than two genders fakers?

i am keeping up, you just keep contradicting yourself.
You do not understand. What you're using is called the 'No True Scotsman' fallacy. What I'm using applies to just about any label. Please refer back to the example I used. If you cannot accept feminism for what it is, instead of dismissing anything you don't like as "not feminism", then you are not worthy of identifying with the movement.

usually I just shelve people like anita sarkeesian into the 'radical feminist' category

would it be the "real" feminists calling the feminists that believe there are more than two genders fakers?
who the forget knows at this point, it seems like literally every other person has a different take on what they think feminism is, you want me to keep track of who the real ones are?

Just when I thought you've reached the apex of your idiotic nonsense, you post again

You're a joke
*sigh* Go ahead and fire up the ol' Drama then, I guess. This is not the place.

who the forget knows at this point, it seems like literally every other person has a different take on what they think feminism is, you want me to keep track of who the real ones are?
WHICH ONE IS THE REAL FEMINIST

What you're using is called the 'No True Scotsman' fallacy.

Well considering the feminist movement is to achieve equality between lovees, anyone who isn't for equality in turn isn't a real feminist...

Well considering the feminist movement is to achieve equality between lovees, anyone who isn't for equality in turn isn't a real feminist...
pretty much this

You do not understand. What you're using is called the 'No True Scotsman' fallacy. What I'm using applies to just about any label. Please refer back to the example I used. If you cannot accept feminism for what it is, instead of dismissing anything you don't like as "not feminism", then you are not worthy of identifying with the movement.
The "No True Scotsman" argument would be if she were saying "anita sarkeesian is not a feminist"
what she's saying is
anita sarkeesian is a terrible feminist
i know reading comprehension is really hard but these are two radically different statements