Author Topic: Climate change should now be considered an emergency  (Read 5744 times)

How long will it take for people to realize it's a natural cycle that happened before and will happen again? We didn't do anything. Are we also to blame for continents moving? Should we prevent it? Let's tell on the continent's parents.

How long will it take for people to realize it's a natural cycle that happened before and will happen again? We didn't do anything. Are we also to blame for continents moving? Should we prevent it? Let's tell on the continent's parents.
http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

How long will it take for people to realize it's a natural cycle that happened before and will happen again? We didn't do anything. Are we also to blame for continents moving? Should we prevent it? Let's tell on the continent's parents.
There's quite a big difference between those two things. Do we have things that cause pollution? Yes, Do we have machines that can push continents.. no?

Living inland always helps

Eradicate all human, that's a good solution


why don't we just build higher


just demolish all the inland stuff and move everything inland
um

i'll recycle more than i've ever recycled before

also it's nice to point out that theguardian is a slightly bias source
« Last Edit: July 10, 2015, 12:49:38 PM by Couatl »



humans are part of nature too, yknow
He said "How long will it take for people to realize it's a natural cycle that happened before and will happen again? We didn't do anything."

There was a distinction made between humans and a natural cycle.

He said "How long will it take for people to realize it's a natural cycle that happened before and will happen again? We didn't do anything."

There was a distinction made between humans and a natural cycle.

ah got it ty

Bye bye Bangladsh lol.
Most of the country is lower than 12m above sea level, and it's estimated that about 10% of the country would be submerged if sea levels rose by 1m.

At least India could have a nice self-contained bay for water sport.

well i was watching this video on ancient England and it said one of their castles was placed on the shoreline but now the shoreline is a mile out from the castle which i thought was cool
It's often quite the opposite in the UK, with coastal towns and castles and the likes being at risk of massive landfalls due to erosion.
The southern side of the Isle of Wight for example loses approximately 1-2cm of coast a year, if I recall correctly.

But then there are other areas where the coast has grown with silt deposits from the many coastal rivers and brought up by the sea, often creating large sand burrows.