Author Topic: Questioning Video Game Logic  (Read 5803 times)

are you familiar with the word "exaggeration"
Yeah I almost used it in my original post but cut it out before I posted it.

I don't like game theory either, it just pisses me off of how he tries to make it even worse than it actually seems to be. Sorry that I actually respect people without liking them.
I guess that makes you the good guy here :¬)

Why can't I grow a plant that grows into orbit? Does a plant like that even exist? If so, where can I find it?
Yes, I am a fan of Grow Home.

Why can't I grow a plant that grows into orbit? Does a plant like that even exist? If so, where can I find it?
Yes, I am a fan of Grow Home.
only after lots of trial and error and mostly guessing

Yes, because this is what they are TOTALLY like and TOTALLY say, like, spot on impression.

Yeah, no, it's a joke, sorry.

Seriously where the forget are you getting this all from? I've checked out Game Theory recently and their past videos to see if you had a reason for this.

Personally don't like fnaf that much, but that's just my opinion.

Nope.

k

Stop trying to make them seem like they are worse than they are, because they aren't even close to this at all, your "mockery" of them is ten times as cringeworthy as Game Theory ever will be.

Personally, I don't believe Game Theory is really that bad, but it has some things to work on. With fnaf in the equation, and trying to prove that "mario and sonic" have some kind of baseless ulterior motive seems utterly ludicrous - it feels like they're trying to feed conspiracy to 11 year olds; something that several preteens look for these days (in my opinion) due to books of the likes of let's say; Hunger Games or Divergent. Kids now want to be the next person who "reveals the big bad".

Give a good reason for hating them or get out

Fan pandering, weak subjects and arrogance. The point of the post was to joke around, not to baselessly say that Game Theory sucks, but just that I don't like it.

because all I see you doing is trying to advertise the GameTheoryIsStupid bandwagon and it doesn't want to make me join.

Look, I've believed that Game Theory was a silly concept by my own volition since what, before they even made their fnaf videos? I loved them when they started out because it felt like they were doing real - stable - theories, not by going off of facts that end in a "it can be this or that, think about it". I loved the theories that used actual math instead of loosely tying obscure and implicit facts from some kind of poorly written horror game together - or completely rewriting what a company stated as fact.

In fact, this is why, at the beginning, it could've been called Game Theory in the first place, as the definition of theory (from my knowledge) is "An idea or experiment that has been repeated many times over and over without fail as of yet" - where half of Game Theory's "theories" aren't really theories - but speculation. Previous theories had numerous tests with many people there to back them. They worked.

And this isn't a bandwagon either - people have stated many, many valid points on the subject which are not just "the fanbase is filled with 11 yr olds". It's the fact that Game Theory went from a Youtube channel that was genuinely enjoyable, to a Youtube channel that attempts to fan pander to its main audience - 11 yr olds.

my biggest problem with game theory isn't the show itself, although I'm definitely not a fan, it's the people who take it literally. No, this character isn't actually dead/asleep/a ghost or whatever the hell.

my biggest problem with game theory isn't the show itself, although I'm definitely not a fan, it's the people who take it literally. No, this character isn't actually dead/asleep/a ghost or whatever the hell.

and this

my biggest problem with game theory isn't the show itself, although I'm definitely not a fan, it's the people who take it literally. No, this character isn't actually dead/asleep/a ghost or whatever the hell.
remember the quote "it's just a theory"
Also rename channel to game speculation
« Last Edit: August 29, 2015, 12:05:36 AM by Malleo100 »

remember the quote "it's just a theory"
Also rename channel to game speculation

yeah, but people tend to take theory as fact

WHY AM I SHOOTING BULLETS FROM A SHOTGUN.

Reality facts:No shotgun fires bullets. If it would,it would not be a shotgun. Shotguns fire mini-cannon balls. Now thats something for nightmares! Getting hit by 12 cannon balls.

it always boggles me how king dedede can lug a giant metal hammer that shoots rockets and fire around like it was nothing & carry kirby around, yet shows almost no muscle mass, has a pretty big gut, and from the ssb4 artwork & model, there's obviously a lot of room in his coat's sleeve, implying his arms and hands are actually pretty small

it always boggles me how king dedede can lug a giant metal hammer that shoots rockets and fire around like it was nothing & carry kirby around, yet shows almost no muscle mass, has a pretty big gut, and from the ssb4 artwork & model, there's obviously a lot of room in his coat's sleeve, implying his arms and hands are actually pretty small


it always boggles me how king dedede can lug a giant metal hammer that shoots rockets and fire around like it was nothing & carry kirby around, yet shows almost no muscle mass, has a pretty big gut, and from the ssb4 artwork & model, there's obviously a lot of room in his coat's sleeve, implying his arms and hands are actually pretty small
his arms may be small, but they're completely ripped

remember the quote "it's just a theory"
Also rename channel to game speculation
I have no misconceptions as to what a theory is, it's the chuckleforgets that can't differentiate speculation from actual facts that do. I once had a guy dead-ass tell me that some Mario character (the princess in the galaxy games i think) was actually like God or something and the game took place in heaven. Like, dude. It's a game, chill.

Why do NPCs in Hitman shoot you in the face for running in the street, playing with a light switch, setting off a metal detector, or entering the wrong bathroom?

(Earlier Hitman games, not Absolution)
The reason why is because in Hitman: contracts and below, the games had a horrible AI and Hitman 2 has the worst AI in the whole series. The game is supposed to be a stealth game in real life if you saw some guy running into a building that is protected by guards they would ask why he is running and all that, in Hitman the game is supposed to have the detection meter when it gets to red guards will start to attack you because of this the AI is flawed. When playing with the light switch its simple the light goes off which can piss off the NPCS and they will attack you, in the past I've had trouble with Hitman 2 than any other loving stealth game I've ever played there is even a mission called "at the gates" which is the worst Hitman mission out of the series and the AI in that is horrendous.

In Contracts the AI is still a bit the same but when Hitman blood money came out the AI was improved. Blood money was the easiest game out of the whole series

A better question is why there are no ally grunts or hunters in Halo 3, despite many of them siding with the elites during the civil war in Halo 2. Even if it was just a minority who revolted in 2, there should still be at least a few in Halo 3 but instead there are only ally elites.

Thanks for answering my question, I think that in Halo 3 the reason why grunts and hunters aren't allied with the elites is because the Grunts are handicapped little guys when the master chief appears it scares the stuff out of the grunts so that being the grunts probably didn't want to side with the elites because they were scared of John.

The hunters are more of a robotic enemy which have worms inside them and the prophets must have brainwashed them to attack the humans.