9/11: ITS OVER OSAMA BIN LADEN WINS

[ABlockOfCheese]

wow your name says right, you really are a stufflord

steel weakens with temperature
do you get it yet???????

also like I said it took out most if not almost all of the core structure
the building fell in on itself
the outside structure can't support the whole thing

http://www.serendipity.li/wot/other_fires/other_fires.htm

also like i said before the engineers who designed the buildings did so in a way that they would withstand a plane hitting them

[Ad Bot]

[shitlord]

wow your name says right, you really are a stufflordhttp://www.serendipity.li/wot/other_fires/other_fires.htm

also like i said before the engineers who designed the buildings did so in a way that they would withstand a plane hitting them

source?

also apparently I'm a stufflord for arguing that slamming a loving airplane into a building can take it down

[Alternat¡ve]

steel weakens with temperature
do you get it yet???????

also like I said it took out most if not almost all of the core structure
the building fell in on itself
the outside structure can't support the whole thing

ya cause if i bold, italicize and underline my post then i wont need to post a valid response..

fr is anyone surprised stufflord is arguing in this thread

[ABlockOfCheese]

source?

im assuming you mean for this

also like i said before the engineers who designed the buildings did so in a way that they would withstand a plane hitting them

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/brown townysis/design.html

please excuse the awful web design of these websites, but there really is a lot of good information

apparently I'm a stufflord for arguing that slamming a loving airplane into a building can take it down

no you're a stufflord because you insist on your side of the argument but have not provided a single source to back up your claims.  whether or not i am right about what happened on 9/11, i still have more credibility than you right now because my argument doesn't consist of yelling, screaming and kicking my way to success.  it actually consists of real sources.

fr is anyone surprised stufflord is arguing in this thread

to be expected i guess

as your source shows the wings were longer
maybe it took out one too many of the supports with them?

grasping at straws

[shitlord]

as your source shows the wings were longer
maybe it took out one too many of the supports with them?

[shitlord]

oh so I make a civilized retort based on your source and I'm grasping at staws
i'm done talking with you if you're going to act like this

[Decepticon]

christ you two are just as bad as the other

[Maxwell.]

1) the plane hit the tower and caused it to fall
2) jet fuel can't melt steel beams

now please shut the forget up you're both acting like idiots

[ABlockOfCheese]

oh so I make a retort based on your source and I'm grasping at staws
i'm done talking with you if you're going to act like this

no, you are grasping at straws because that type of retort is anecdotal and has no weight in an actual debate

the wingspan was just over 10 ft difference, made up of aluminum.

do you really believe that 10 extra feet of aluminum would be the "straw that broke the camels back" or in this case, that one last huge concrete-reinforced-by-steel support?  do you even really care about what we are arguing about or are you just doing it for the sake of being at odds with someone?

[shitlord]

I care because its pretty loving obvious that slamming a plane into an older building is going to take it down

[ABlockOfCheese]

I care because its pretty loving obvious that slamming a plane into an older building is going to take it down

i've already addressed this in my previous posts.  feel free to reread them at your leisure.

[Planr]

What Block of Cheese is failing to take into account is that the WTC builds were hit by 767s. When the buildings were first made almost half a century ago they were designed to withstand impacts only from planes about as big as a 707.

http://edition.cnn.com/2001/US/09/12/wtc.architect.cnna/

[shitlord]

i've already addressed this in my previous posts.  feel free to reread them at your leisure.

then there is nothing else to argue
regardless of design there are still multiple variances that are not addressed with he age of the building and the differences in the planes
the weight of the plane in the building is already many tons on top of the straining section of impact

[Maxwell.]

What Block of Cheese is failing to take into account is that the WTC builds were hit by 767s. When the buildings were first made almost half a century ago they were designed to withstand impacts only from planes about as big as a 707.

http://edition.cnn.com/2001/US/09/12/wtc.architect.cnna/

pretty much this

[Decepticon]

What Block of Cheese is failing to take into account is that the WTC builds were hit by 767s. When the buildings were first made almost half a century ago they were designed to withstand impacts only from planes about as big as a 707.

http://edition.cnn.com/2001/US/09/12/wtc.architect.cnna/

pretty much this