Author Topic: [DATA] political issues and your stances on them - BORDER SECURITY, IMMIGRANTS  (Read 12124 times)

i support abortion in all cases. it's the woman's body, it's her right to choose. furthermore, why force a woman to have a baby that she doesn't want? what kind of parent do you think she'll be if she's forced to raise a child? and adoption isn't always a good option, children tend to sit in homes or bounce around through different foster homes and don't turn out all that well.

some of the small ones could probably work as sounds too
NO

To the people who say they don't agree with abortion under any circumstance:

What if a women was raped, and would die if she gives birth. Additionally what if the child was going to be born with a horrible disability with a high fatality rate? Is it really more moral to let a women die and a child suffer for a few years and then die, rather then killing a fetus?

If the child/baby/fetus/whatever you wanna call it is totally healthy and everything is going smoothly, I don't think it's right to just kill it.

Accidental pregnancies: Absolutely not. If you didn't want a baby, you should've used protection (or reliable protection) and it's your fault.
Incest: This shouldn't even happen in the first place with mutual acceptance, so of course not. If it isn't mutual, it'd fall under rape.
Rape: I'm on the fence on this. Tbh if a woman is raped, something like a morning-after pill or some sort of doctor visit/intervention would be okay to make sure she didn't conceive. A woman who doesn't get help from it and lets a baby continue growing without telling anyone though, should not be allowed to have one imo because she just made the situation partly her fault.
Birth defects such as missing limbs, Down's Syndrome, etc: No. The child can still live a happy life and contribute to society under most circumstances. If they can't, it usually won't be apparent until after the child has been raised.

Not sure if I missed any situations. Covering medical issues below:

Now if the mother and baby are both in grave danger and there is no other option, then I guess it would a termination would end up in the list of things for the mother to choose from. I don't think there are many, if any, situations where the baby is totally healthy and the mother's life is put in danger because of it. Even if that's the case, such as she can't give birth normally or carry a full sized fetus in her womb, then she could just have a C-section prematurely. Not ideal, but at least there's a good chance neither of them will die. I'm not saying that I or anyone else should have to choose what the woman decides, since it is her decision. I'm just saying that if she makes the decision to kill the fetus, then she won't have my support or applause, and that if I get a chance to vote on whether or not abortion becomes widespread, I'll vote no.

he's going to say yes. it doesn't matter how horribly you try to word it
he might try to beat around the bush about it but whatever he says, deep down it's going to mean "yes"

You made me cry bro I'm so sad :((((((( :panda: :panda:


If the child/baby/fetus/whatever you wanna call it is totally healthy and everything is going smoothly, I don't think it's right to just kill it.
but what if the parents don't want it, and it ends up growing up with parents who don't love it and it has a hard life?
granted, they could put it up for adoption

granted, they could put it up for adoption
do u think that's an easy life

do u think that's an easy life
no, but it's a better option nontheless

it'll definitely be hard for them to find out, but the children were adopted because the parents actually wanted them and will end up having a better life than what they would if they weren't put up
« Last Edit: November 06, 2015, 05:34:33 PM by Maxwell. »

do u think that's an easy life

It can be, it's not always terrible. A lot of people have led amazing lives even after being put up for adoption by their own parent(s).

Well... scientists could find a way to preserve a fetus for couples who are incapable of having children.

Accidental pregnancies: Absolutely not. If you didn't want a baby, you should've used protection (or reliable protection)
What if you did use protection, but it was sabotaged (eg. hole poked in condom)?

What if you did use protection, but it was sabotaged (I.e. hole poked in condom)?
should've used two condoms

Well... scientists could find a way to preserve a fetus for couples who are incapable of having children.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embryo_cryopreservation
well it's Wikipedia, but it is something

Well... scientists could find a way to preserve a fetus for couples who are incapable of having children.

"Doctor! We can't have a baby!"

"That's okay! In my drawer here, I have a box of frozen babies to choose from! These here are the rows of boys, each separated by hair color. On this side, we have girls. We're running a 30% off deal on gingers!"





(I'm kidding, not a bad idea.)

What if you did use protection, but it was sabotaged (eg. hole poked in condom)?

You just found a reason to investigate it before you blindly use it.

You just found a reason to investigate it before you blindly use it.
what if the love ends up being so hot that the condom melts

If you don't want a baby don't have love

Simple

If you don't want a baby don't have love

Simple
so why deprive humans of doing something they want to do for fun when there are measures to stop it?