Author Topic: Lord Tony's new infatuation with endlessly harping on Fallout 4  (Read 91201 times)

gsterman layin down some real stuff finally


Jesus loves you
Not you blockchip because you just got roasted

Jesus loves you
Not you blockchip because you just got roasted
you'd better be talking to me

This thread is like cheesy tabloids, full of garbage but for some reason I find myself comming back to read it

Yes, i am 12.
That is my current age.
I'm expecting the next few posts to be among the lines of "that explains a lot" and "haha you're 12, now i can dismiss any point you make based on your age!"

Saying he's blatantly trolling is a stretch beyond imagination. Beside the Harvest stuff I dont see him causing any noticable harm(and even that is pretty quaint). If you're going to get brown town about a guy saying that you're "harvested" or whatever then you have bigger problems than whether this one guy on some obscure internet forum gets banned or not.
Also, he doesnt stuffpost. You disagreeing with the content of his posts does not make them stuffposts. The majority of his posts are perfectly reasonable, and the ones that arent completely reasonable are still passable.
Multiposting is not against the rules either. I can quote Badspot on this. Whether its annoying or not is another question, but it isnt bannable in and of itself.
I am not saying that they are stuffposts because i disagree with them.
I didn't mention myself being "harvested" in that post. I do not care that i am "harvested"
And i didn't say that tony was doing anything bannable or against the rules.
I said that i think he is trolling, and i asked whether trolling was bannable. That is it.
Heres the thing, though. Tony hasnt really been doing anything "stupid" except for the whole Harvest thing. You and multiple other people seem to get a giant stiffy whenever he posts and look for every opportunity to goad him into loving up and getting banned. He hasnt done anything nearly ban worthy, you just have beef with him and want him banned. If we banned everyone on this forum for being an starfish and stuffposting there would be like 5 people here. And regardless of whether he stuffposts or is an starfish, that is not the case the majority of the time as he still contributes to useful discussion. (And yes, I can give you multiple examples of discussions he has created and contributed to on his current account)
Again, i didn't say he was doing anything bannable.
And i really feel like him contributing to useful discussion is the minority of the time and not the majority.
Tony, from what I've seen, has never baited anyone on his current account. If you could provide examples and prove me wrong I would be perfectly willing to detract that statement, but ill stand by that for now.
And how exactly does one loving accidentally bait someone into getting banned? You mean all those people antagonizing him about his clan and stuff and trying to get him to talk about MLP were just doing it on accident and had no idea of what they were doing? Get loving real lmao, those people knew crystal clear what they were doing and it was obvious as forget. Like "Oh I didn't know there was anything prohibiting Lord Tony from talking about MLP, even though I asked him fifteen times about it for no reason and had multiple people tell me that it was super loving obvious I was baiting him."
If anything the people trying to get him banned by laying out booby traps for him should be banned for trolling. Following this random dude on the internet around and trying to get him to talk about ponies and admit to trolling so you can get him banned is seriously creepy.
It isnt a stuffpost if it contributes to discussion and is relevant to the topic at hand. Tony made valid points and met both of those criteria.
This thread, however, contributes literally nothing and says nothing that hasnt already been said. Yes, we know Tony is an starfish, and we know that because there are about 5,000 other loving dramas that say exactly what you're saying.
Are you saying that all of tony's points against fallout 4 are valid ones?
It really doesn't seem like that to me.
I can't think of a single fallout 4 posts that makes a point against the game being good or fun, they only complain that the game isn't realistic or isn't like new vegas, and he always grinds on that complaints, no matter how stupid, for pages and pages.
Multiple times on this thread, when i have said something against tony, people said something along the lines of "hahaha hook line and sinker you idiot"
Here's a bunch of examples.
you know that 90% of the attention lord tony has gotten has been handed to him on a sliver plater by you guys right
if it's so mentally agonizing, you should know that he's getting what he wants
then ignore it? hes only "getting a rise out of people" because they're giving a stuff enough to post
Blockchip is taking the bait like a school of pirhannas.
so you know tonys just trying to get a rise out of you, and yet you STILL continue? are you just arguing for the sake of arguing now?
Can you name examples from more than one person on this thread intentionally baiting tony  into saying something?
He doesnt have to politely state his opinion. Is it appreciated? Yes. Is it polite and a nice thing to do? Yes. Is it a requirement? No.
Multiposting isnt against the rules. Badspot has said this before, and im fairly sure on more than one occasion.
And I find it seriously funny how this community will celebrate and use things like a rape mod and a school shooting server, but when a random jackass on the forums comments about rape not being in a videogame everyone looses their collective stuff and acts like its such a surprise. Yes, the comment was tasteless as all forget, but other people do literally the exact same loving thing and if someone gets offended by that they get told to chill the forget out.

You can not get someone banned on the argument of "He posts a bit too much and tries to get people to notice his complaints about the game(some of which are actually decently thought out) and also he says stuff that I dont like(but its okay if someone we like makes an addon about the same topic), and he should be banned for this even though the majority of the posts he makes actually are good and contribute to discussion".

That is your entire argument. He has not broken any rules. He has not admitted to trolling. He has not spammed research. What it all boils down to is that you dont like him and what he says. And because of that, you pull out bullstuff arguments like "he posts too much" and "his complaints on this one topic are petty and offensive". Well guess what, neither of those things are bannable.

I also want to be very clear with something; I dont like Lord Tony in any way. I think he's a jackass. But you and several other people are grasping at straws for reasons to ban him. Like it is seriously getting to stalker-ish levels when there are people that deliberately follow him around the forums and try to get him banned.
It really seems to me like that is your entire argument.
Everything you say here revolves around the assumption that whenever say tony did something i am also saying he should be banned for it, which i am not.
There's a difference between celebrating a rape mod and actively complaining that a game does not include rape, saying that it is a factually bad game because of it.
I think that the very small minority of tony's posts are decently-thought out and that most of them are just grasping at straws, and whether it's a straw or a decently-thought-out criticism, i really feel like there's no excuse for clinging to them as much as tony does.

okay blockchip even im going to tell you to stop now

I'll say this, for a post apocalyptic game it's missing the core savage aspects to make it a post apocalyptic world that's too PC for even the modern age.

Even Mad Max includes rape or at least hints at it.

okay blockchip even im going to tell you to stop now
I don't see how what i did is any different than what gesterman did, which you responded to with this:
gsterman layin down some real stuff finally

I'll say this, for a post apocalyptic game it's missing the core savage aspects to make it a post apocalyptic world that's too PC for even the modern age.
Even Mad Max includes rape or at least hints at it.
Like i said earlier, it seems to me like you expect fallout 4 to be a realistic hardcore survival game just because it's set in the post-apocalypse.
I don't see why being set in a post-apocalypse means a game HAS to include rape.

An M rated title that's trying to be politically correct in a post apocalyptic setting? Who are they trying to appeal to, children? I've seen worse stuff in GTA 5.


In Fallout 2 if you were a woman with very low intellect you will get date raped. You'll also get raped by a super mutant if you have strength lower than 9.

You can even suck richard for 5 caps in Fallout 2.



Fallout 2 doesn't screw around with trying to be politically correct.

I don't see how what i did is any different than what gesterman did, which you responded to with this:
because you've been arguing for almost 30 pages now and he finally said something that would maybe realize you need to stop but instead you kept going
even me, stufflord, knows when its time to stop, especially after almost 30 pages

Controversy sells anyways, you figure Bethesda would want to sell games on controversy instead of trying hard to not offend anyone.

Controversy sells anyways, you figure Bethesda would want to sell games on controversy instead of trying hard to not offend anyone.
I don't think anyone in Bethesda's accounting department is regretting lack of controversy.


Controversy sells anyways, you figure Bethesda would want to sell games on controversy instead of trying hard to not offend anyone.
I don't see how Bethesda is intentionally trying hard not to offend anyone by not including rape.
I can't think of a way how fallout 4 could've had rape that wouldn't be extremely forced, and i don't think the inclusion of rape would add anything to the game.