Fallout 4 is a good game but it's not a good Bethesda game and it's not a good Fallout game.
So you're literally admitting "I think this is a good game, but i hate it anyway because it's made by bethesda"?
It actually has less content.
http://imgur.com/a/Mvc3i
Thats a picture comparing the amount of quests in Fallout 4 to the amount of quests in Skyrim.
Fallout 4 is a good game but it's not a good Bethesda game and it's not a good Fallout game.
I don't think pure quest numbers are a good way of measuring content.
It doesn't take into account the length of the quests, or the amount of things to do that aren't quests.
Besides, "Less content" doesn't mean "worse game".
Fo4 is nothing but a reskinned skyrim.
They're both RPGs made by Bethesda using the same engine.
Can you name any further similarities?
I don't hate the game, I hate the direction the franchise is going.
They really should have worked with Obsidian on Fallout 4 together. obsidian even asked Bethesda but they said no.
I'm pretty sure if fallout 4 was the exact same game except made by obsidian you'd lay right off it.
I've been more excited for the possibility of NV 2 than Fallout 4.
If you think new vegas is so much better than fallout 4, why don't you stop complaining about fallout 4 and go play that instead?
Fallout 4's story was 100% predictable. So I haven't done a single main story quest because I already knew what was going to happen before the spoiler leaks and before the game came out.
Because that's the only reason you play a game, for the story.
Gameplay? Pfft!
Also, if you haven't done a single story quest, how do you know the story?
Also, please stop saying you predicted "100%" of the story.
You didn't.
It's like saying you predicted the entirety of star wars by saying "The rebels fight an empire and then they defeat the empire in the end".
I've only done side quests and so far each quest has been "go here, kill x."
Obsidian pumped out better quests than that.
It's an action shooter-RPG.
The gameplay is based around killing things.