Author Topic: Nickpb, child enthusiast/Child Predator, overall useless piece of stuff  (Read 270873 times)

oh my god pay-a-loving-tention it wasnt bubbagum that said she was 19. Your hate boner for nick is way too strong.

wow thanks for mis-reading everything I've loving said

I want the evidence of the 15 year old saying that shes 19

the reason im debating this is because if she never said that then nick FULLY KNEW that she was 15 and sent nudes to her


you don't have to feel guilty in this situation at all, you were a minor

nick seriously

regardless of whether or not he thought they were 19 he still was an starfish to bubba

even if for some reason her reason to send those nudes were valid, she is still a victim in the eyes of law

nick is a legal adult while a minor isn't able to me logical decisions - even if she was older nick was the male who pressured her into doing so. im not trying to be a feminist here but not matter what you victimized her nick

How about instead of blaming the person who took the picture, you blame the person who spread it around behind her back? You're acting as if by sending the picture, she endorsed its distribution. While sending risque pictures of yourself is questionable, secretly distributing the personal pictures of others is far worse.

only in the sense that she could have chosen not to send it.
yes this.

like really i fully understand your guys' perspective, but at the end of the day she still sent it, and im sure she was well aware of the risks and possibility that it would be spread around

i guess i wasnt making my point clear but:

no she literally can't control nick spreading it
what she could control was her picture being sent in the first place, avoiding the entire problem that ensued

both are in the wrong

I mean, he has the right to send the picture to whomever he wants, but it's still a scummy thing to do. I don't care about the other stuff; he abused her trust.

like really i fully understand your guys' perspective, but at the end of the day she still sent it, and im sure she was well aware of the risks and possibility that it would be spread around
She is still legally a minor, and at the end of the day its best to presume they can't make the best decisions.

Also, I'm sick of people misusing the word "child enthusiast". Legally, yes, it is child enthusiasm if they're under the age of consent, but in reality, no, 16-year-olds do not count for child enthusiasm.

yea legally it was wrong, but it was still only a 2 year age difference

like really i fully understand your guys' perspective, but at the end of the day she still sent it, and im sure she was well aware of the risks and possibility that it would be spread around

Was she? From what I've read, she thought she could trust Nick to keep it private. Are you blaming her for trusting Nick?

Also, I'm sick of people misusing the word "child enthusiast". Legally, yes, it is child enthusiasm if they're under the age of consent, but in reality, no, 16-year-olds do not count for child enthusiasm.

16 is under age of concent in some states and any nude pics of 16 yrs are considered child research

16 is under age of concent in some states and any nude pics of 16 yrs are considered child research

did you read what I posted at all

Yes it would, how could they be faked?
http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=192425.0
Everything on the internet can be faked. What you chose to accept as evidence is purely personal preference and based on what your threshold of unlikeliness-of-fakeness is.

did you read what I posted at all
he has this habit of ignorance

even if for some reason her reason to send those nudes were valid, she is still a victim in the eyes of law
except the law doesn't care about that. nothing she did would get her out of it if she got into legal trouble over this. in the eyes of the law... she knew it was illegal, he wasn't threatening her, and she still did it. that's why sometimes the law sucks butt
and im sure she was well aware of the risks and possibility that it would be spread around
virtually everything you do has risks involved, and you are aware of those risks. driving, drinking something in a public place, doing almost anything at all with someone you don't know, all have risks, that you know about before you do them. that doesn't mean it's your fault when something goes wrong (unless, like, it actually is your fault, like you rear end someone while you're texting, but that's beside the point). you can be blamed for just about anything that happens to you, depending on exactly how ridiculous you wanna get. but unless you directly cause something, it's pretty unreasonable to blame you for it, especially when it involves another human being