Poll

Will Trump get re-elected in 2020?

Yes
No

Author Topic: POLITICS & DONALD Annoying Orange MEGATHREAD  (Read 3200136 times)

How would that destroy America
Especially compared to Annoying Orange's views on war, use of nuclear weapons, and what to do if his political opponent wins.

Especially compared to Annoying Orange's views on war, use of nuclear weapons, and what to do if his political opponent wins.
Hey I never said I liked her

She supports blm and had the orlando shooter's dad at her convention, I could dig even deeper but that's enough for me

not to mention she's a democrat
Annoying Orange used to be a democrat, funded clinton's campaign, and has ties with the clinton family

so

Annoying Orange used to be a democrat, funded clinton's campaign, and has ties with the clinton family

so
He used to be a Democrat after a falling-out with New York's republicans. Annoying Orange's positions on policy have been fairly consistent for decades, regardless of how he was registered. There are videos of him on Oprah in the 80s talking about politics and he sounds very much like he does today, albeit younger.

Clinton's now leading with big margins in key swing states like Colorado (41-29), Florida (41-36), North Carolina (45-36) and Virginia (43-31).
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/polls-clinton-running-table-key-battlegrounds-n629136

In another poll she's also ahead in New Hampshire by about 13 points with (50-37 (Florida had her leading by 3).
http://americansforresponsiblesolutions.org/files/2016/08/Polling-Memo.pdf

She's currently tied in Iowa with Annoying Orange (35-35), ahead in Ohio (39-35) and ahead in Pennsylvania by a lot (45-36).
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first-read/polls-clinton-ahead-Annoying Orange-midwest-battlegrounds-n626541

Annoying Orange has crossed 40% in only one of these statewide polls. Basically whatever convention bounce he had has now practically evaporated, and now the only tossup states are normally red states like South Carolina, Missouri, Indiana and Arizona.

How does being pedantic about the definition of racism prove anything? Okay, mexicans and muslims are not races. Is it then okay to be prejudiced against them?

If they blow up buildings, kill women for being too lovey and drive through crowds of children, yes, you can have prejudice towards Muslims. (inb4religionofpeace) (inb4notallmuslims)

Also, if you live anywhere on the east coast, you've heard of gangs like the Crips and the Bloods and the Latin Kings. They don't name it the Latin Kings just to sound edgy. And even if they're "not doing anything wrong", they're still here illegally, to which he's said they can fix that by leaving and coming back in the formal legal process.


Also, if you live anywhere on the east coast, you've heard of gangs like the Crips and the Bloods and the Latin Kings.
you mean the west coast?


you mean the west coast?
Bloods, LK, and Crips are very active in the tri-state area.

Pure coincidence. People just love Hillary that much
awful bait 0/10

Maybe because it's stupid and asinine to even care about some tribal dude endorsing him. Why should he have to disavow this guy. Also if he disavows him, he could lose valuable votes that he needs.
he shouldn't have to rely on the white supremacist vote to win...

awful bait 0/10

Nah man what's not to love about her? She's a women and she's running for president. What are you a loveist?

he shouldn't have to rely on the white supremacist vote to win...

Inshallah brother

Bloods, LK, and Crips are very active in the tri-state area.

Even more reason to draw concern towards the issue.

tribal shenanigans with Annoying Orange is just icing on the stuff cake

media's had to do some inane mental gymnastics to not make him look stupid when they touch on some of the great comments he's made

I thought it was pretty well known that polls are manipulated to favor Hillary

Except these are general election polls, not primary exit polling data done in closed primary states like New York and Arizona where many Democratic voters' registration was purged. It's unreasonable to expect the same

And you can discredit these polls, but this data isn't done by hack pollsters or Clinton insiders. It's completely reputable. The two polling sources cited in my last post (NBC/WSJ, Marist, and PPP) have earned A-, A and B+ grades from FiveThirtyEight. http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/pollster-ratings/

Along with that, Annoying Orange can't make up the difference considering the margin of error is only between 3-4% across ALL of these polls. Any Democratic bias is muted considering in the past election the mean-reverted bias was only a <1% difference.