Um... Excuse you, nowhere did I dismiss it because "it conflicts with my political views." I don't "agree" with it because all that holds that ridiculous conspiracy together is heaps and heaps of speculation and unsubstantiated claims.
It clearly does though, I might as well excuse you for constantly calling it a bunch of speculation and unsubstantiated claims when there's literally 60,000+ emails to back all of this up, real life accounts of child enthusiasm being practiced in politics both in the UK and the US, and walls upon walls of text explaining their reasoning with photo/video evidence to back it up. You're method of disapproval is dismissing it without even reading the thing. You replied only 30-40 minutes after my OP, it took me 2 whole hours to get through the entire batch, so if anything your opinion on the matter is incredibly invalid because you truly don't even know what you're talking about. Sure, you know what the book is about, doesn't mean you know the entire story.
I'm a conspiracy theorist, burn me at the loving stake, god forbid anyone think against the grain.
ok maybe im not getting this right but are you taking the_donald seriously and saying that people who think it's complete nonsense are just dismissing it because it conflicts with their political views
I don't see an issue with taking something like this seriously when there's a heap of content within that isn't difficult to grasp. Just because that place has a track record of being stuff doesn't mean everything that comes out if it is stuff, things are always subject to change and always do change.
Poll