Poll

Will Trump get re-elected in 2020?

Yes
No

Author Topic: POLITICS & DONALD Annoying Orange MEGATHREAD  (Read 2986004 times)

the evidence is that there is zero evidence
there is no basis to the claim at all

so unproven automatically equals false; and anyone who suggests it may be true is wrong despite there being no evidence?
you're not so smart
« Last Edit: November 26, 2016, 12:39:25 PM by Rally »

reddit and 4chan have a habit of electing themselves vigilante detectives, thinking they're saving the world from corruption and uncovering some great secrets to fuel their hero complex when really all they're doing is harassing innocent people with unsubstantiated claims and taking the slightest coincidence and running with it. it's momentum-based, meaning they'll accept pretty much anything as evidence as long as it perpetuates the illusion that they are garnering more and more evidence and getting closer to uncovering some grand conspiracy, and when they stop coming up with coincidences to loosely connect, it'll end up the empty shell of a stuff-flinging, ego-stroking campaign.

so unproven automatically equals false; and anyone who suggests it may be true is wrong despite there being no evidence?
isn't that how you feel about like rape accusations and stuff lol

so unproven automatically equals false; and anyone who suggests it may be true is wrong despite there being no evidence?

Something being unproven implies falsehood In this context. Treating something unproven as true is unwise. This is why people are searching for quantifiable evidence to support their theory, not arguing on a forum about how it's supposedly dumb that something being unproven automatically means it's false.

Long story short, proofs or gtfo

isn't that how you feel about like rape accusations and stuff lol

Yes I support the presumption of innocence because I'm not mentally handicapped.
It's not a 'burden of proof' argument. You can't criticize someone's suggestion as completely false and then back it up with a source that says it might not be false lmao. I feel like people are so quick to stuff out Snopes articles relevant to the discussion that they're not actually reading them.

It's not a 'burden of proof' argument. You can't criticize someone's suggestion as completely false and then back it up with a source that says it might not be false lmao.

You definitely can, however, when the source claims it's hearsay, not "It might not be false". Somebody's suggestion means nothing when the only thing backing it up might be hearsay, and trying to suggest that using the article as a source is wrong because it's allegedly biased is also a fallacy.

You definitely can, however, when the source claims it's hearsay, not "It might not be false". Somebody's suggestion means nothing when the only thing backing it up might be hearsay, and trying to suggest that using the article as a source is wrong because it's allegedly biased is also a fallacy.

Yeah but nobody's really citing the 'hearsay' as their source, it was juxtaposed it with several other items to construct an argument in favor of the 'hearsay' being true, and it was dismissed a snopes link that didn't actually provide any evidence in either direction lol

Hillary just teamed up with Jill Stein to do a vote re-count and Annoying Orange is upset.

Hillary just teamed up with Jill Stein to do a vote re-count and Annoying Orange is upset.
Rage against the political machine!

i heard that stein is getting money from the recount

i heard that stein is getting money from the recount
The Green Party is getting the excess money raised.

Jill Stein's Twitter account is pretty hilarious right now lol

I'd like to point out that the goal for the fundraiser is being raised every time it is reached

The Green Party is getting the excess money raised.

Jill Stein's Twitter account is pretty hilarious right now lol
-Jill Stein Questioning the need for a Recount-
What, why the hell is she tweeting that?
Jill Stein raising money for a Recount.

Is she a hypocrite, or did her Twitter account get hijacked?

she's a nutjob, i'd be surprised if it got hacked

didnt she get caught doing graffiti? or was that fake