Lol, bullstuff. If a predominantly black crowd protested about tennis, the news would still turn it into a story about 'rioting blacks'.
You might see race as like, context for the issue, but people here on the forums and the US in general see it as the cause of the issue. If you can't agree with that, I don't know what forums you've been browsing.
what the forget are you talking about
context and cause in terms of a riot are the same
the context is that they're rioting because of X
also,
i would like an example of something not being about race and the headline still includes "black protesters/rioters"
tbh I don't think I've even used the word 'tribal' on this forum in like weeks/months. At least not directed towards a forum user. It's definitely an SJW-trope to over-label, but I think I've been pretty good at attacking arguments rather than people. Just my opinion.
I didn't say you were flat-out calling people tribal
really smart SJWs know that the term has no power anymore, so they'll resort to what you did and they'll go Jerry Seinfeld on something that the opponent said, out of context, and imply through veiled language that it is an example of blatant racism when really there's much more to it than "white privilege"
Poll