POLITICS & DONALD Annoying Orange MEGATHREAD

[Whackin]

yeah remember that time russia invaded berlin and had a nice civil debate with Riddler

if you're a neo-national socialist you dont deserve to feel safe in public. its that simple.

a protest is different than a war

[Ad Bot]

[beachbum111111]

if you're a neo-national socialist you dont deserve to feel safe in public. its that simple.

This is the same as the "if you're white you're responsible for slavery" argument.

Like I said before. A liberal Master Mathew.

[Red Spy]

if you're referring to richard spencer, then yes he deserved much worse than a punch in the head.

neo-national socialists in general are, politically and ethically speaking, the group of people most acceptable to physically harmyeah remember that time russia invaded berlin and had a nice civil debate with Riddler

if you're a neo-national socialist you dont deserve to feel safe in public. its that simple.

If I said this same stuff but about communists you'd call me a fascist

[Poliwhirl]

a protest is different than a war

the point is that if you literally advocate the genocode of a race, you lose the right to civility and should expect nothing but justified violent backlash.

This is the same as the "if you're white you're responsible for slavery" argument.

Like I said before. A liberal Master Mathew.

???
what does slavery have to do with this?

If I said this same stuff but about communists you'd call me a fascist

difference is that the ideology of communism doesnt inherently involve genocide and white supremacy

[SeventhSandwich]

if you're a neo-national socialist you dont deserve to feel safe in public. its that simple.

I don't agree with this. Neo-national socialists deserve to be ostracized and criticized for what they believe, but it's not a good idea to selectively deprive legal rights from people with certain beliefs.

There's a reason why the ACLU, a supposedly leftist legal organization, has sued on the behalf of the WBC, kool kids klub, and Confederate sympathizers - when you allow people to infringe on the rights of the 'bad people', it sets a precedent for depriving rights from the good people.

[beachbum111111]

the point is that if you literally advocate the genocode of a race, you lose the right to civility and should expect nothing but justified violent backlash.???

Oh so in that case violent backlash is justified against BLM.

what does slavery have to do with this?

I was comparing your argument with another equally dumb argument.

difference is that the ideology of communism doesnt inherently involve genocide and white supremacy

Neither does Fascism.

[RedGajin]

yeah neo national socialists deserve to catch a fade whenever wherever, same as CIA and the likes do. neo national socialists kill people and speak out against interacial interactions as a whole, and im sure most of them wouldn't mind exterminating everyone besides white people. i fail to really see the difference between the views of a neo national socialist and a CIA member (unless things have changed recently but im not sure?). obviously neo national socialists aren't a huge terrorist group threatening thousands of lives, but you get my drift

people like westbero baptist church, i mean i dont think theyre really  neo national socialists, but all they have is an "opinion" and i dont think anyone would feel bad if any of their members got dropped lol. now am i saying it should be legal or anything? no, but imo i wouldn't really classify the assailant as a bad person

edit: when i say neo national socialists kill people i dont mean every neo national socialist is out commiting murders (or any crime in general), obv im talking about the portion that does in the name of white supremacy (see: aryan brotherhood)

[Nonnel]

Neither does Fascism.

he specifically said neo-national socialists

[Red Spy]

Poli beating people up for stuff you don't like is what fascists do

Thinking whites are better isn't an automatic invitation to get a fist to the face

[Poliwhirl]

I don't agree with this. Neo-national socialists deserve to be ostracized and criticized for what they believe, but it's not a good idea to selectively deprive legal rights from people with certain beliefs.

i dont mean to advocate for the actual revoking of legal rights for neo-national socialists, but im saying that society should vehemently reject national socialists. and although not legal, i am totally fine with them getting their asses kicked.

Oh so in that case violent backlash is justified against BLM.

if you honest to god think BLM is a threat to the white race you're actually a pusillanimous individual

[Decepticon]

if you're a neo-national socialist you dont deserve to feel safe in public. its that simple.

yeah you aren't too far off from being a neo-stalin at this point yourself

[SeventhSandwich]

i dont mean to advocate for the actual revoking of legal rights for neo-national socialists, but im saying that society should vehemently reject national socialists. and although not legal, i am totally fine with them getting their asses kicked.

But not getting your ass kicked is a legal right afforded to the rest of society. You can't pick and choose who gets protection from assault based on political views.

Let me put it this way - I don't see any problem with thinking it's funny that this guy got his ass kicked. But we still have to jail whoever did it.

[beachbum111111]

.if you honest to god think BLM is a threat to the white race you're actually a pusillanimous individual

Do you honestly loving think that Neo national socialist's are a threat? Are you really this loving stupid?

[Decepticon]

if you honest to god think BLM is a threat to the white race you're actually a pusillanimous individual

if you honest to god think neo-national socialists are a threat to races across america you're actually a pusillanimous individual (or really this forgetin stupid)

[Poliwhirl]

But not getting your ass kicked is a legal right afforded to the rest of society. You can't pick and choose who gets protection from assault based on political views.

Let me put it this way - I don't see any problem with thinking it's funny that this guy got his ass kicked. But we still have to jail whoever did it.

again, i never stated it should be legal. only that it is wholly justified.

Do you honestly loving think that Neo national socialist's are a threat? Are you really this loving stupid?

they are threatening in the sense that they are attempting to revive what was probably the worst threat to peace in history, and not threatening in the sense that they cannot go through with it because of the backlash they recieve. aka the backlash is working.