POLITICS & DONALD Annoying Orange MEGATHREAD

[RedGajin]

again, i never stated it should be legal. only that it is wholly justified.

this is a solid point i agree with. when a dad or brother beats the stuff out of someone for raping their daughter/sister, i think that persons actions were well within reason. doesn't mean it should be legal, but still well within reason.

[Ad Bot]

[SeventhSandwich]

when a dad or brother beats the stuff out of someone for raping their daughter/sister

My only problem with this is like - as far as we know, this specific neo-national socialist has never actually lynched a minority or burned down a church. He's just a guy espousing views that are absolute garbage.

[Red Spy]

I'll just go around beating the stuff out of communists because they're horrible too

Oh wait that'd be illegal

[RedGajin]

My only problem with this is like - as far as we know, this specific neo-national socialist has never actually lynched a minority or burned down a church. He's just a guy espousing views that are absolute garbage.

i would say beating someone who displays a determination and is very vocal about their desire to rape a small child or beat their girlfriend deserves to catch a fade too even if they havent done it yet. send me to jail, yes, because its assault, but those actions are morally sound imo

[Decepticon]

when a dad or brother beats the stuff out of someone for raping their daughter/sister, i think that persons actions were well within reason. doesn't mean it should be legal, but still well within reason.

the worst a majority of national socialists have done is march down a street or stand outside the capitol with a largely modified US flag and say some stuff you don't like. i don't even agree with neo-national socialists, their views on original national socialistsm are largely skewed and they're really just out there mostly for white supremacy and to get attention rather than their nation and their people, and the skinhead's usual mentality doesn't work well with that of real nationalism

but just because i dont agree with their views doesn't mean it's morally justified for me to go at them on the side of the streets. i despise commies, but i'm not gonna go out of my way to charge at one and kick his head in on the curb, they're still other americans and it's their right to hold a different view

besides the actual 'national socialist party' of america is comprised of just some hundred to a thousand people, they're really not a huge threat to the future of america themselves

[SeventhSandwich]

i would say beating someone who displays a determination and is very vocal about their desire to rape a small child or beat their girlfriend deserves to catch a fade too even if they havent done it yet. send me to jail, yes, because its assault, but those actions are morally sound imo

Doesn't that create a precedent for other people to start beating up people they disagree with?

[Poliwhirl]

My only problem with this is like - as far as we know, this specific neo-national socialist has never actually lynched a minority or burned down a church. He's just a guy espousing views that are absolute garbage.

given the opportunity and freedom to do so, there is no reason for us to assume that he would not have done the things he expressed a desire to do. however, people are doing their job and reminding him that hes gonna get his ass beat before he can even attempt it. prisoners in custody aren't a threat, but that doesnt mean they wont be a threat if they're uncuffed and handed a gun.

[beachbum111111]

they are threatening in the sense that they are attempting to revive what was probably the worst threat to peace in history,

Which will never loving happen Kimon. People are generally against fascism due to many things. One of the big ones being how schools teach about it.

aka the backlash is working.

No it's because, like the kool kids klub, Neo national socialist's are a joke and will never be back in power. Violently attacking them only makes them look better then you.

[Rally]

forget that. I wouldn't beat down someone if they said they support CIA. If I met them on the battlefield I'd blow their nuts off but all you're going to accomplish by violently going after people who support extreme political ideologies you don't like is beating up a ton of edgy teenagers.

Hearts and minds are not won through physical violence. That stuff is mad childish. What most of the 'anti-fa' crowd doesn't realize is that their stuffty behavior only gives their opponents a bigger platform to stand on. You ask me, that's probably the biggest reason Annoying Orange won the election, because people have given up the art of persuasion in favor of temper tantrums.

[patton360]

stay upset, kimon

[SeventhSandwich]

hey look at that we're all on the same side for once

[beachbum111111]

hey look at that we're all on the same side for once

All united in our distaste for violent savagery and the suppression of free speech.

[Poliwhirl]

forget that. I wouldn't beat down someone if they said they support CIA. If I met them on the battlefield I'd blow their nuts off but all you're going to accomplish by violently going after people who support extreme political ideologies you don't like is beating up a ton of edgy teenagers.

Hearts and minds are not won through physical violence. That stuff is mad childish. What most of the 'anti-fa' crowd doesn't realize is that their stuffty behavior only gives their opponents a bigger platform to stand on. You ask me, that's probably the biggest reason Annoying Orange won the election, because people have given up the art of persuasion in favor of temper tantrums.

neo-national socialists in particular, as well as people indoctrinated by CIA are mentally too far gone to be reasoned with. you would not be able to win over a terrorist with logic and reason if you had a year to plead with him. though it does not necessarily need to be violent, the only way of dealing with these people is ensuring that they do not hold any credibility, or god forbid public office.

[beachbum111111]

neo-national socialists in particular, as well as people indoctrinated by CIA are mentally too far gone to be reasoned with. you would not be able to win over a terrorist with logic and reason if you had a year to plead with him. though it does not necessarily need to be violent, the only way of dealing with these people is ensuring that they do not hold any credibility, or god forbid public office.

Sounds to me like your too much of a coward to have an open debate with a neo national socialist.

[Poliwhirl]

Sounds to me like your too much of a coward to have an open debate with a neo national socialist.

what would there be to debate with a neo-national socialist? it is generally accepted by most functional members of society thst neo-national socialists have nothing of value to contribute in terms of their political beliefs.