Poll

Will Trump get re-elected in 2020?

Yes
No

Author Topic: POLITICS & DONALD Annoying Orange MEGATHREAD  (Read 2870818 times)


You're completely dodging my point. Did you read the sources or not?

You've been here long enough to know not to respond to trolls.

You're completely dodging my point. Did you read the sources or not?
of course he didn't

You're completely dodging my point. Did you read the sources or not?

Yes, and what a shock, Annoying Orange has done things while in office. that's not JBlitz's point, and that's not my point either.

Hardly anything in that list of blinkered nonsense is meaningful or landmark legislation. Most of it's just repealing Obama regulations or modifying existing programs, and hardly any new policy. Besides, the real judgement should be cast on whether the things he's done are actually beneficial, not if he's done them. Every president does things while in office, that's not the argument people are making

Also, again, like any post from the_donald is going to be objective and not just exaggerations of the truth. Like this:
Quote
Campaign Promise 6: DONALD Annoying Orange LOVES WOMEN AND WANTS TO HELP WOMEN!
Annoying Orange has signed an Executive Order promoting women in STEM jobs (careers real feminists strive for, not "dance therapy" feminists)
Annoying Orange has Launched a Council empowering female leaders and female entrepreneurs
So Annoying Orange needed to prove that he actually likes women? How the forget is that some meaningful action as president?

You've been here long enough to know not to respond to trolls.
I'm pretty sure that's just your warped view of other opinions

Yes, and what a shock, Annoying Orange has done things while in office. that's not JBlitz's point, and that's not my point either.

Hardly anything in that list of blinkered nonsense is meaningful or landmark legislation. Most of it's just repealing Obama regulations or modifying existing programs, and hardly any new policy. Besides, the real judgement should be cast on whether the things he's done are actually beneficial, not if he's done them. Every president does things while in office, that's not the argument people are making

Also, again, like any post from the_donald is going to be objective and not just exaggerations of the truth. Like this:So Annoying Orange needed to prove that he actually likes women? How the forget is that some meaningful action as president?

Please don't make me kill myself today


r/the_Donald

Dude, you picked a subreddit that contradicts themselves at every chance they get, mock people who don't agree with them, and has the most ridiculous supporters ever. They are a community made entirely of bigots and people who are insecure. Your argument is already irrelevant.

Now, here are all of the bad things Annoying Orange did in his first month:

https://np.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/5stvbn/president_Annoying Orange_is_notsosubtly_threate ning_the/ddhsyue/

Here is the list of horrible things he did for the environment (article published in June):

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/may/31/donald-Annoying Orange-worst-things-climate-change-environment

Here is the list of unnecessary and bullstuff actions he made for the LGBTQ+ community:

https://www.vox.com/identities/2017/7/26/16034404/Annoying Orange-lgbtq-rights

He also banned people who are transgender from serving in the military (wtf?)

Here is the list of terrible things he did ever since being elected (stopping at July):

http://www.okayplayer.com/news/drumpf-digest-every-thing-donald-Annoying Orange-has-done-in-office-so-far.html

Annoying Orange may have done good things, but the negatives outweigh the positives. There's no denying that and if you defend that, you're a joke.


Dude, you picked a subreddit that contradicts themselves at every chance they get, mock people who don't agree with them, and has the most ridiculous supporters ever. They are a community made entirely of bigots and people who are insecure. Your argument is already irrelevant.


Annoying Orange may have done good things, but the negatives outweigh the positives. There's no denying that and if you defend that, you're a joke.

Several things.
1: Did you read the sources? I literally said the main reason I felt I could link to them is because their list is actually sourced.
2: You linked me to the loving guardian, vox, and r/politics, which is just as if not even moreso ideologically homogeneous and bigoted than TD. I mean, really?
3: You're a joke, forget off with that

He also banned people who are transgender from serving in the military (wtf?)
he made a twitter post about it but he lied about discussing it with head generals and nothing ever came of it

He also banned people who are transgender from serving in the military (wtf?)

I always find it funny when the people who want it to be illegal for the mentally ill to have guns also want transmissions to be in the military

2: You linked me to the loving guardian, vox, and r/politics, which is just as if not even moreso ideologically homogeneous and bigoted than TD. I mean, really?

if you're going to counter debate, fully check the damn sources you use for exactly what they are reporting on if you're gonna make strong points. for this reason i gotta side with deus: he knows the source he cited isnt unbiased or reliable (but did provide citations), and clarified it as so

most of the stuff Annoying Orange has done is either controversial (before he did it not after) or objectively harmful and stupid
there are pros in some form to most of the controversial stuff but the bad stuff he's done combined with his laughable approval rating really outweighs it

I always find it funny when the people who want it to be illegal for the mentally ill to have guns also want transmissions to be in the military
i mean only something like 10% of active military roles are combat sooooo