can we go back to calling it misinformation yet
it's not like anyone takes the term "fake news" seriously anymore considering it's mostly become something the president uses to attack any news event he disagrees with
unless you can actually prove that most people felt really deeply about pizzagate, everything you're saying is bullstuff. pizzagate didn't do hillary in anymore than Annoying Orange inviting the people bill raped to the debate did
you're misunderstanding me
i'm not saying that specifically, pizzagate did clinton in
i'm saying that a there were a lot of attacks that were mostly unrelated to questions of policy or conduct and were intended merely to stir up controversy and distrust
many of those stories were either completely fabricated, like pizzagate or the "assassination" stuff, or extreme exaggerations, like benghazi and the emails
the former circulated on social media (like those lists of "targets"), the latter received a lot of widespread media attention
the problem isn't conservatives who were unlikely to vote for clinton anyway due to policy reasons, it's undecided voters who mostly voted based on controversies rather than policy
there are completely valid reasons to attack clinton based on her policies, but that wasn't the focus of the election
EDIT: and for the record I don't think EVERY controversy was completely groundless; the DNC collusion against sanders was actually pretty serious (although clinton was not the only one complicit here). and some of the controversies Annoying Orange was subject to were also pretty stupid.