Poll

Will Trump get re-elected in 2020?

Yes
No

Author Topic: POLITICS & DONALD Annoying Orange MEGATHREAD  (Read 2894556 times)

there are civilians on the front lines you sped

Not after they all kill themselves fighting your female soldiers you autistic sandmonday

Not after they all kill themselves fighting your female soldiers you autistic sandmonday
civilians aren't enemies you Silly Boy

civilians aren't enemies you Silly Boy
Yeah Beachbum, they're for target practice

bruh how you gonna say women aren't as capable as men when your richard game was so wack it turned your girlfriend gay

and you guys talk about me sperging out

bruh how you gonna say women aren't as capable as men when your richard game was so wack it turned your girlfriend gay
LMAO


lets keep excusing illegals until we move from deportation to extermination


http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/11/30/kate-steinle-s-accused-killer-found-not-guilty-murder.html

hey let's talk about this bullstuff
I mean, if courts are the ultimate arbiter of truth on matters like whether Cosby raped somebody, then clearly this guy is innocent. Having an opinion on criminal behavior outside of the precepts of a legal court is clearly unacceptable.

I mean, if courts are the ultimate arbiter of truth on matters like whether Cosby raped somebody, then clearly this guy is innocent. Having an opinion on criminal behavior outside of the precepts of a legal court is clearly unacceptable.

I thought cosby was confirmed by the courts to be a zippaty boppaty love offender

and you guys talk about me sperging out


http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/11/30/kate-steinle-s-accused-killer-found-not-guilty-murder.html

hey let's talk about this bullstuff
It seems like another zimmerman trial where there just wasn't enough hard evidence to incarcerate anybody

I mean, if courts are the ultimate arbiter of truth on matters like whether Cosby raped somebody, then clearly this guy is innocent. Having an opinion on criminal behavior outside of the precepts of a legal court is clearly unacceptable.

The reason I am in favor of taking people to trial is because that's where the majority of hard evidence gets to be displayed. If that hard evidence is shown out of court, then that's fine too. It's why I think that Harvey Weinstein did what he did; because we have the tapes.

While there's not a lot of hard evidence for Cosby, the evidence that got displayed here clearly convicted this guy of at least involuntary manslaughter. The reason he was let go was because the prosecution was stupid and charged him with second-degree murder instead of the former charge.

Even then, does it matter? The guy is an illegal immigrant who's slipped into the country at least six times. He has prior drug offenses. He should not have been here. In fact, he WOULD not have been here had San Francisco not been a sanctuary city.
« Last Edit: December 01, 2017, 07:39:30 PM by Tactical Nuke »

The reason I am in favor of taking people to trial is because that's where the majority of hard evidence gets to be displayed. If that hard evidence is shown out of court, then that's fine too. It's why I think that Harvey Weinstein did what he did; because we have the tapes.
That's a fair position. But why does Bill Cosby admitting to drugging women with Quaaludes not count as hard evidence?

Even then, does it matter? The guy is an illegal immigrant who's slipped into the country at least six times. He has prior drug offenses. He should not have been here. In fact, he WOULD not have been here had San Francisco not been a sanctuary city.
I also agree that people with extensive rap-sheets shouldn't be allowed to immigrate here, legally or otherwise. But maybe the solution here is to reform immigration policies so that we can have more good people granted citizenship and less people like him allowed in, and then perhaps San Francisco would comply with federal immigration law.

That's a fair position. But why does Bill Cosby admitting to drugging women with Quaaludes not count as hard evidence?

Because he only admitted to drugging the women. He said nothing about "yes, I raped them afterwards". In fact, he maintains the love was consensual.

If you bought a gun and were charged with buying a gun that you used to murder your family, you aren't guilty of murdering your family if you admit that you bought a gun.

EDIT: Now that I think of it, he didn't even admit to "drugging women". He admitted to giving women drugs. Not the same.

I also agree that people with extensive rap-sheets shouldn't be allowed to immigrate here, legally or otherwise. But maybe the solution here is to reform immigration policies so that we can have more good people granted citizenship and less people like him allowed in, and then perhaps San Francisco would comply with federal immigration law.

Didn't we try this with the RAISE thing and people blew their stuff all over the walls in response?
« Last Edit: December 01, 2017, 08:12:29 PM by Tactical Nuke »

i drug women all the time. it's a totally normal thing that in no way implies rape