Because i can't be bothered to talk about so many posts, especially when I've already talked about most of them, and some of them aren't even worth acknowledging.
You wanted evidence, and now you "can't be bothered to talk about so many posts"? Talk about trying to avoid the truth.
Not being able to lock the thread is completely irrelevant to the fact that it'll die faster if you don't post in it.
To be fair, your also posting in it. (Don't bother telling me why, I already know).
You're right, though. I didn't say that. Even if it's similar to what i said or intended (it isn't), it's still not what i said, so if the argument relies on that quote, then yes, it is invalid.
So one word off means "it's not what i said"? Again, trying to avoid the truth.
...what?
Look at what you've said, you've got nothing left. (Not that you had anything in the first place). You've been reduced to kindergarden like tactics.
This doesn't at all disprove what i said. All you're doing is passing it onto me. Which is, ironically, exactly what i accused you of.
No, that doesn't. Everything else I've said, everything I've quoted. Everything everyone has said. And quoted, has disproved what you said.
At least I've said "maybe i'm wrong". That's a really, really big start compared to you people, who haven't done anything of the sort, but still insist that i'm the one that needs to admit i'm wrong.
Your wrong, it would be a really big start. If we were wrong, but we're not. I mean, read the quote below!
I think it's fine to say the word 'monday' regardless of whether someone is a monday.
You honestly think this is acceptable? You honestly thing it's fine to say whatever slur you want? You are the reason bullying exists.
Is that sarcasm? Are you seriously trying to say that it's impossible to quote someone on something they haven't said?You can type whatever you want inbetween quote marks.
No, it isn't. "You can type whatever you want inbetween quote marks." But if you never said oh, idk. This
I think it's fine to say the word 'monday' regardless of whether someone is a monday.
Then how is it possible to quote you on something and hold it against you? You may be able to type whatever in between quote marks, but that doesn't make it a quote.
I could do this.
I'm a imbecile
And yet if everyone goes and looks back through the thread, you clearly never said that.
Nothing's preventing you from typing in them something someone hasn't said. The same goes for forum quotes.
That is very much true, but I could still go through the entire thread to see if said person altered the quote or not.
Besides, everything we've quoted you have said. We can go back through the thread and see it. Unquoted.
It's still even more so you.
"I know I am but what are you" Childish. Just childish.
I don't care how many people disagree with me. The amount of people that think something is completely irrelevant to whether it's true or not.
Everyone is going to disagree with you. So there is no point in continuing to try to make yourself seem innocent.
Also, why do you seem to think that putting something intentionally stupid inbetween a set of quote marks that's somewhat similar in some ways to what i said is a valid alternative to arguing against what i actually said?
It's not valid. We're mocking your childish antics.
You give preteens a very bad name. With your disgraceful behavior.
